ASSIGNED 47738
CSS aspect-ratio master bug 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47738
Summary CSS aspect-ratio master bug
Fady Samuel
Reported 2010-10-15 13:53:15 PDT
Still in the early stages of design/development. However, here is an early, working prototype, implemented in WebKit as described here: http://www.xanthir.com/blog/ under "aspect-ratio CSS property".
Attachments
Experimental Patch For aspect-ratio property (45.05 KB, patch)
2010-10-15 13:56 PDT, Fady Samuel 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Experimental patch rev. 2 for aspect-ratio property (63.70 KB, patch)
2010-12-03 09:29 PST, Fady Samuel 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Fady Samuel
Comment 1 2010-10-15 13:56:30 PDT
Created attachment 70894 [details] Experimental Patch For aspect-ratio property
Tab Atkins
Comment 2 2010-10-15 14:52:15 PDT
Stable permalink for the spec: http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b4810
Fady Samuel
Comment 3 2010-12-03 09:29:12 PST
Created attachment 75503 [details] Experimental patch rev. 2 for aspect-ratio property
Ojan Vafai
Comment 4 2011-10-17 20:36:24 PDT
FWIW, this has already been discussed at www-style http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Oct/0046.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0550.html. It's just blocked on Tab and Fantasai having enough time to put in into a formal spec as far as I can tell. I don't see any problems with moving forward with this as a webkit-prefixed property.
Rob Buis
Comment 5 2020-12-17 08:10:26 PST
I'll use this master bug to track the new aspect-ratio work: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2020-October/031543.html
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 6 2021-03-15 10:39:46 PDT
<rdar://problem/75435850>
Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders]
Comment 7 2021-08-13 10:32:43 PDT
does it make sense for this to still be open? the one dependency is a much broader issue than just aspect-ratio
Rob Buis
Comment 8 2021-08-18 07:21:12 PDT
(In reply to Sam Sneddon [:gsnedders] from comment #7) > does it make sense for this to still be open? the one dependency is a much > broader issue than just aspect-ratio I would like to fix bug 222357 before closing this bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.