Bug 40829 – Get a perfect score on html5test.com

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: WORKSFORME
• Component: WebKit Misc.

[Trevor Downs]

The website <http://html5test.com/> tests browsers for the existence of HTML5 features and can be used to gauge the progress of features. I'd like to see WebKit hit 300/300 before the other engines do. Note that this site only currently checks for the existence of features, not that they are correct.


Current scores (running on Mac OS X 10.5 PPC):

WebKit 533 (Safari 5): 208 + 9.
Firefox 3.6.3: 139 + 4.
Opera 10.53 (Presto 2.5.24): 129 +4.

WebKit r61351: 230 + 9.
Firefox 3.6.4 (Build 7): 139 + 4


Note that I have the Xiph.org Ogg/Theora/Vorbis plugin installed, giving my machine an extra point.

[Trevor Downs]

I forgot the iPhone!

iPhone 3G, iPhone OS 3.1.3 (iOS 3.1.3):
WebKit 528.18: 125 + 7
Opera Mini: 22.

[Trevor Downs]

iPhone 3G/iOS 4, WebKit 532.9: 185 + 7

[Alexey Proskuryakov]

I'm not sure if getting 300/300 on this test should necessarily be a goal. But it's interesting that this test claims there's no "HTML5 tokenizer" or "HTML5 tree building" in ToT.

The very first subtest fails: div.innerHTML = "<div<div>" is expected to add a node with name "DIV<DIV".

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r61744: 231 + 9

What is ToT?

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r62241 235/300 +9

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r62632: 236 + 9

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r62909: 232 + 9.

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

(In reply to comment #2)
> iPhone 3G/iOS 4, WebKit 532.9: 185 + 7

This is being tracked for iPhone using:  <rdar://problem/8215076>

We also have radars covering differences between Safari 5 and iOS 4.0.x, so there's no need to file other bugs.

We will also eventually pick up fixes committed to trunk as well.

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r63958: 222 + 10

[Oli Studholme]

I’m all for progress, but after the fun with HTML5 form validation I’d prefer usable HTML implementations over rushing to ship:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40747
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40761

That said, keep on truckin’ Webkit peeps :)

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!)

[David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)]

(In reply to comment #11)
> WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!)

Why did the score go down from a high of 236 + 9 in Comment #6?

[Trevor Downs]

(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > WebKit r65398: 227 + 10 (Tokenizer now detected!)
> 
> Why did the score go down from a high of 236 + 9 in Comment #6?

Mainly due to WebGL being broken/gone. That is 10 points there.

[Trevor Downs]

Webkit r66052: 232+12 !

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r71484: 233 + 12! <output> now supported & detected.

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r74228: 235 + 12, I'm guessing figure and figcaption support.

[Ridley Combs]

May I request that we move the URL to http://beta.html5test.com/ and change the title to "Get 400/400 points on the HTML5 Test"?

[Gavin Sherlock]

I get 288 + 9 points, on r75891 at http://beta.html5test.com/.  Note, to enable WebGL, you have to do:

defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitWebGLEnabled -bool YES

[Ridley Combs]

In normal, I get 245+15. In beta, I get 288+15. This is with WebGL plus every media plugin imaginable.

[Trevor Downs]

(In reply to comment #17)
> May I request that we move the URL to http://beta.html5test.com/ and change the title to "Get 400/400 points on the HTML5 Test"?

I think if any tests should be strived for, the stable release tests should be the priority over the beta tests. While 400/400 sounds better, the beta tests could be updated at any time completely hosing the score of anything being tested.

[Trevor Downs]

(In reply to comment #18)
> I get 288 + 9 points, on r75891 at http://beta.html5test.com/.  Note, to enable WebGL, you have to do:
> 
> defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitWebGLEnabled -bool YES

Has WebGL been re-enabled? I have it turned on but none of the WebGL code runs.

[Trevor Downs]

The HTML5 test has been updated, it is now 400 points!

Here's how the browsers do (based on what I can run on 10.5 PPC ;) ):

* WebKit r80210: 273 + 12

* Safari 5.0.3: 228 + 9
* Safari (iOS 4.2.1): 206 + 7
* Firefox 3.6.14: 155 + 4
* Opera 10.63: 214 + 7

[Reelix]

I would also like to see this.

In fact - I would be happy with a base score of 300 points - Just 9 more to go! :D

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r83424: 271 + 15
I updated Perian which now supports WebM, so that accounts for the bonus improvement. I wonder what broke to lower the main score?

WebKit r83750: 271 + 15

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r88189: 269 + 15

[Reelix]

Chrome 11.0.696.77

293 and 13 bonus points

Best so far! :D

[Lars Gunther]

Is there a bug for http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5ASS/

[Trevor Downs]

(In reply to comment #27)
> Is there a bug for http://www.html5accessibility.com/HTML5ASS/

You should just create one.

[Trevor Downs]

Safari 5.0.6 (5533.22.3): 293 + 15.

[Eric Seidel (no email)]

I went through the test suite this afternoon and broke down all our failures in this spreadsheet:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlC4tS7Ao1fIdHZtUDNsOFNFYmxGbzZFVVJERUswZFE#gid=0

The end result is that we're already the "best" engine according to html5test.com, and almost all of the remaining tests we either already pass (and the suite is wrong) or we have code in progress (either behind compile-time flags, or with webkit- prefix guards).

About the only interesting implementation work left might be <command> (bug 58454), HTMLInputElement.dirname (bug 76766), and seamless iframes (bug 45950).

[Trevor Downs]

As of the 2012-01-01 update:
* Safari 5.0.6 (5533.22.3) on 10.5.8 PPC: 302 + 15

[Trevor Downs]

WebKit r134216 (OS X 10.8.2 Intel 64): 388+15
Safari 6.0.2 (OS X 10.8.2 Intel 64): 378+15

[Anne van Kesteren]

html5test.com was last updated in 2016. Tracking it has served its purpose.