RESOLVED FIXED 96444
IndexedDB: fire upgradeneeded even without an explicit integer version 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96444
Summary IndexedDB: fire upgradeneeded even without an explicit integer version
David Grogan
Reported 2012-09-11 16:06:03 PDT
IndexedDB: fire upgradeneeded even without an explicit integer version
Attachments
Patch (36.18 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 16:06 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (40.53 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 16:08 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (41.34 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 17:32 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (44.88 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 18:41 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (47.45 KB, patch)
2012-09-12 15:59 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (49.30 KB, patch)
2012-09-13 18:18 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Patch (49.30 KB, patch)
2012-09-13 19:32 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
ToT (49.25 KB, patch)
2012-09-17 15:31 PDT, David Grogan 		no flags
DetailsFormatted DiffDiff
Show Obsolete (7) View All Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
David Grogan
Comment 1 2012-09-11 16:06:30 PDT
Created attachment 163468 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 2 2012-09-11 16:08:08 PDT
Created attachment 163469 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 3 2012-09-11 17:32:49 PDT
Created attachment 163488 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 4 2012-09-11 18:41:34 PDT
Created attachment 163492 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 5 2012-09-11 18:47:49 PDT
With this patch we do indeed pass the w3 tests Josh separated out. Except one, http://w3c-test.org/webapps/IndexedDB/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/idbfactory_open9.htm . It fails because of a different int-version issue. This patch doesn't apply to ToT because it is based on 90411.
David Grogan
Comment 6 2012-09-12 15:59:26 PDT
Created attachment 163725 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 7 2012-09-12 16:03:56 PDT
jsbell@, could you take a look at this? As we predicted there's not much code change, mostly tests.
Joshua Bell
Comment 8 2012-09-13 11:29:27 PDT
Comment on attachment 163725 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=163725&action=review LGTM! > Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBLevelDBBackingStore.cpp:-342 > - // FIXME: Change this to strictly greater than 0 once we throw TypeError for This patch does not alter the (erroneous) behavior for open(name, -1), correct? It's still an alias for open(name), and that will be fixed (on the front end) in a separate bug?
David Grogan
Comment 9 2012-09-13 18:18:58 PDT
Created attachment 164020 [details] Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10 2012-09-13 18:22:01 PDT
Attachment 164020 [details] did not pass style-queue: Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'LayoutTests/ChangeLog', u'LayoutTests/http..." exit_code: 1 Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:9: Need whitespace between colon and description [changelog/filechangedescriptionwhitespace] [5] Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:11: Need whitespace between colon and description [changelog/filechangedescriptionwhitespace] [5] Total errors found: 2 in 30 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
David Grogan
Comment 11 2012-09-13 19:32:30 PDT
Created attachment 164030 [details] Patch
David Grogan
Comment 12 2012-09-13 19:39:32 PDT
Comment on attachment 163725 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=163725&action=review >> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBLevelDBBackingStore.cpp:-342 >> - // FIXME: Change this to strictly greater than 0 once we throw TypeError for > > This patch does not alter the (erroneous) behavior for open(name, -1), correct? It's still an alias for open(name), and that will be fixed (on the front end) in a separate bug? That's right.
David Grogan
Comment 13 2012-09-17 15:31:59 PDT
Created attachment 164462 [details] ToT
David Grogan
Comment 14 2012-09-17 15:33:43 PDT
Tony, could you review this? I'm not going to land it until tomorrow so it's not urgent at all.
David Grogan
Comment 15 2012-09-17 15:34:05 PDT
Tony, could you review this? I'm not going to land it until tomorrow so it's not urgent at all.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 16 2012-09-19 13:28:12 PDT
Comment on attachment 164462 [details] ToT Clearing flags on attachment: 164462 Committed r129037: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129037>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 17 2012-09-19 13:28:16 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.