EFL WK2 needs a separate Skipped file located at LayoutTests/platform/efl-wk2/Skipped so that it will be possible to keep EFL WK2 bot green.
Created attachment 157697 [details] patch
Comment on attachment 157697 [details] patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=157697&action=review > LayoutTests/ChangeLog:6 > + Uneviewed gardening. Unreviewed
Created attachment 157701 [details] patch v2
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 157697 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=157697&action=review > > > LayoutTests/ChangeLog:6 > > + Uneviewed gardening. > > Unreviewed Ouch..
Comment on attachment 157701 [details] patch v2 Clearing flags on attachment: 157701 Committed r125273: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125273>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Why would we add a Skipped list? We have been trying to get rid of the one for WebKit1-EFL for several months now. Adding one for WebKit2-EFL really seems like a step backwards. Is there a technical reason not to use a TestExpectations file?
(In reply to comment #7) > Why would we add a Skipped list? We have been trying to get rid of the one for WebKit1-EFL for several months now. Adding one for WebKit2-EFL really seems like a step backwards. Is there a technical reason not to use a TestExpectations file? I have tried TestExpectations first and it did not work for me, then I noticed that neither mac nor GTK (which does not have Skipped list for WK1 at all) use TestExpectations for WK2. I understand that TestExpectations is better but we need first to provide a fix in scripts to make it work.
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Why would we add a Skipped list? We have been trying to get rid of the one for WebKit1-EFL for several months now. Adding one for WebKit2-EFL really seems like a step backwards. Is there a technical reason not to use a TestExpectations file? > > I have tried TestExpectations first and it did not work for me, then I noticed that neither mac nor GTK (which does not have Skipped list for WK1 at all) use TestExpectations for WK2. I understand that TestExpectations is better but we need first to provide a fix in scripts to make it work. Ok, thanks for the explanation. I will try to fix the scripts and use TestExpectations instead in Bug 93796. Qt port is using TestExpectations for WK2 so it is possible.