Summary: | [Meta] Make CSS in WebKit more awesome | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Dimitri Glazkov (Google) <dglazkov> |
Component: | CSS | Assignee: | Nobody <webkit-unassigned> |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | Enhancement | CC: | arv, cmarcelo, dominicc, donggwan.kim, fsamuel, hyatt, igor.oliveira, morrita, ojan, peter, phiw2, rafael.lobo, sam, simon.fraser, skyul, syoichi, webmaster |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Bug Depends on: | 46593, 12519, 16020, 16662, 42764, 46591, 46592, 46594, 46595, 49142, 52040, 52162, 103597 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
2010-09-26 16:25:47 PDT
What's the point of this bug? (In reply to comment #1) > What's the point of this bug? Purely organizational -- it's a nice treetop: https://bugs.webkit.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=46590&hide_resolved=0 I am not sure I understand how all those bugs are related. Can we give this a more descriptive title? There are lots of efforts to make CSS more awesome (hyatt's recent pagination work, dan's recent hyphenation work, hyatt's current block-flow work), should they all be under this umbrella bug? (In reply to comment #3) > I am not sure I understand how all those bugs are related. Can we give this a more descriptive title? There are lots of efforts to make CSS more awesome (hyatt's recent pagination work, dan's recent hyphenation work, hyatt's current block-flow work), should they all be under this umbrella bug? Yes, they totally should! I thought about using keywords at first, but they are a bit awkward and don't show a nice hierarchy of depending bugs. I don't mind giving this a better title. I agree with Sam, it's unclear why we have this dormant meta bug. |