Introduce SelectorCheckingEffects.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96445
Summary Introduce SelectorCheckingEffects.
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Reported 2012-09-11 16:08:21 PDT
Introduce StyleCheckingEffects.
Attachments
Patch (14.70 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 16:11 PDT, Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
koivisto: review-
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 1 2012-09-11 16:11:26 PDT
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 2 2012-09-11 16:11:52 PDT
This
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 3 2012-09-11 16:12:26 PDT
This is based off the patch on bug 96425. Expect purple until it lands.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 4 2012-09-11 16:22:13 PDT
Comment on attachment 163472 [details] Patch Effects is kinda an odd name, but this looks fine. I don't have any better suggestions. :)
Antti Koivisto
Comment 5 2012-09-12 06:03:50 PDT
Comment on attachment 163472 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=163472&action=review > Source/WebCore/css/SelectorChecker.h:80 > + // Some information can't be determined until the selector checking runs. > + // This struct captures that information. > + struct SelectorCheckingEffects { Name "Effects" doesn't make sense to me here. Wouldn't it be better to capture all return values (including SelectorMatch) to something like SelectorCheckResult? r- for now.
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 6 2012-09-12 09:12:16 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > (From update of attachment 163472 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=163472&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/css/SelectorChecker.h:80 > > + // Some information can't be determined until the selector checking runs. > > + // This struct captures that information. > > + struct SelectorCheckingEffects { > > Name "Effects" doesn't make sense to me here. Wouldn't it be better to capture all return values (including SelectorMatch) to something like SelectorCheckResult? Yup. Sounds good. > > r- for now.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.