WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 93170
93707
toggling a inline element's children between display:none/block appends an extra ::after pseudo-element.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93707
Summary
toggling a inline element's children between display:none/block appends an ex...
Couto
Reported
2012-08-10 03:14:05 PDT
Overview: toggling a inline element's children between display:none/block appends an extra ::after pseudo-element. Steps to Reproduce: In HTML: - Create a <ul> element with some <li> elements as children In CSS - Apply a CSS rule to the <ul> element setting the element to display: inline - Set an ::after pseudo-element with the content property to the <ul> element - Set all <li> elements to display: none and then remove the display: none rule (with Javascript) Actual Results: Every time the display:none rule is removed from the <li> elements, the <ul> element gets multiple ::after elements Expected Results: The <ul> should only have 1 pseudo-element. Build Date & Platform: Google Chrome Version 23.0.1231.0 canary on MacOSX 10.7.4 Additional Builds and Platforms: Safari Version 6.0 (7536.25) on MacOSX 10.7.4 Webkit (7536.25 537.6+) on MacOSX 10.7.4 Google Chrome Version 22.0.1229.2 dev on MacOSX 10.7.4 Google Chrome Version 21.0.1180.60 m on Windows 7 Chromium 21.0.1180.75-1 on Linux tigon 3.4.7-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jul 29 22:02:56 CEST 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Additional Information: This bug doesn't happen in non-webkit browsers.
Attachments
WIP
(6.91 KB, patch)
2012-09-06 01:56 PDT
,
Takashi Sakamoto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.11 KB, patch)
2012-09-11 17:18 PDT
,
Takashi Sakamoto
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.09 KB, patch)
2012-09-27 23:48 PDT
,
Takashi Sakamoto
inferno
: review-
buildbot
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Takashi Sakamoto
Comment 1
2012-09-06 01:56:18 PDT
Created
attachment 162452
[details]
WIP
Takashi Sakamoto
Comment 2
2012-09-06 05:33:51 PDT
I'm sorry. This patch is not for fixing this issue. I found the another issue and create the patch. I will recreate a new patch for this issue. Best regards, Takashi Sakamoto
Takashi Sakamoto
Comment 3
2012-09-11 17:18:00 PDT
Created
attachment 163485
[details]
Patch
Takashi Sakamoto
Comment 4
2012-09-27 23:48:31 PDT
Created
attachment 166152
[details]
Patch
Build Bot
Comment 5
2012-09-28 06:34:45 PDT
Comment on
attachment 166152
[details]
Patch
Attachment 166152
[details]
did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/14059337
New failing tests: http/tests/misc/acid3.html
Abhishek Arya
Comment 6
2012-09-28 21:04:17 PDT
this was at one time a security bug and i have run into this. the fix is wrong though. read the comment above. // Ensure that all of the split inlines pick up the new style. We 163163 // only do this if we're an inline, since we don't want to propagate 164164 // a block's style to the other inlines. 165165 // e.g., <font>foo <h4>goo</h4> moo</font>. The <font> inlines before 166166 // and after the block share the same style, but the block doesn't 167167 // need to pass its style on to anyone else.
Abhishek Arya
Comment 7
2012-09-29 23:56:58 PDT
This is the same bug as
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93170
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 93170
***
Takashi Sakamoto
Comment 8
2012-10-01 04:23:18 PDT
Thank you for comments. (In reply to
comment #6
)
> this was at one time a security bug and i have run into this. the fix is wrong though. read the comment above. > > // Ensure that all of the split inlines pick up the new style. We > 163163 // only do this if we're an inline, since we don't want to propagate > 164164 // a block's style to the other inlines. > 165165 // e.g., <font>foo <h4>goo</h4> moo</font>. The <font> inlines before > 166166 // and after the block share the same style, but the block doesn't > 167167 // need to pass its style on to anyone else.
I see. Since this bug is duplicate, I updated a new patch to
bug 93107
(taking another way) for fixing the issue. Best regards, Takashi Sakamoto
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug