RESOLVED FIXED 83802
Web Inspector: extracting NetworkRequest from Resource (step 3)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83802
Summary Web Inspector: extracting NetworkRequest from Resource (step 3)
Pavel Feldman
Reported 2012-04-12 12:01:13 PDT
This change extracts NetworkRequest from the Resource. It is now clear that these two should have super class that would be responsible for parsing URL and would define the requestContent signature. Corresponding patch will follow.
Attachments
Patch (62.27 KB, patch)
2012-04-12 12:07 PDT, Pavel Feldman
yurys: review+
Pavel Feldman
Comment 1 2012-04-12 12:01:42 PDT
Pavel Feldman
Comment 2 2012-04-12 12:07:07 PDT
Timothy Hatcher
Comment 3 2012-04-12 12:18:12 PDT
What is the motivation for this change?
Pavel Feldman
Comment 4 2012-04-12 13:03:17 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > What is the motivation for this change? I posted more details in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61363#c2.
Pavel Podivilov
Comment 5 2012-04-13 04:30:02 PDT
Comment on attachment 136950 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=136950&action=review > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/RawSourceCode.js:57 > + if (this._request) Is it possible that both request and resource exist? If yes, it should be "this._request && !this._resource". > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/RawSourceCode.js:138 > + if (!this._request || !this._hasNewScripts) It should probably be !this._resource.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 6 2012-04-13 04:43:04 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > (From update of attachment 136950 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=136950&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/RawSourceCode.js:57 > > + if (this._request) > > Is it possible that both request and resource exist? If yes, it should be "this._request && !this._resource". > No, it is not possible. > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/RawSourceCode.js:138 > > + if (!this._request || !this._hasNewScripts) > > It should probably be !this._resource. This is ex-useTemporaryContent, so it is based on request, not resource.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 7 2012-04-13 05:00:27 PDT
Comment on attachment 136950 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=136950&action=review >> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/RawSourceCode.js:57 >> + if (this._request) > > Is it possible that both request and resource exist? If yes, it should be "this._request && !this._resource". Let's rename it to _pendingRequest > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/ResourceScriptMapping.js:99 > + if (request && (request.finished || request.type !== WebInspector.resourceTypes.Document)) request.finished check seems redundant for inflights.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 8 2012-04-13 05:15:30 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.