RESOLVED FIXED 73584
Changes proposed for 73457 slow down Kraken json-parse-financial
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73584
Summary Changes proposed for 73457 slow down Kraken json-parse-financial
Michael Saboff
Reported 2011-12-01 13:11:43 PST
The changes proposed for bug 73457 slow down Kraken json-parse-financial by about 3%.
Attachments
Patch (4.97 KB, patch)
2011-12-01 13:25 PST, Michael Saboff
sam: review+
Michael Saboff
Comment 1 2011-12-01 13:25:27 PST
Darin Adler
Comment 2 2011-12-01 15:07:26 PST
Comment on attachment 117475 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=117475&action=review Why 4 bytes and not 8 on 64-bit architectures? Can this share code with StringHash.h instead of adding more copies of code that does the same thing? > Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/text/StringImpl.cpp:714 > +#if !(CPU(ARM) || CPU(SH4) || CPU(MIPS) || CPU(SPARC)) StringHash.h uses a different list for this.
Sam Weinig
Comment 3 2011-12-01 19:44:16 PST
Comment on attachment 117475 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=117475&action=review Please take Darin's comment into account. > Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/text/StringImpl.cpp:754 > + if (length & 1 && *reinterpret_cast<const UChar*>(aCharacters) != *reinterpret_cast<const UChar*>(bCharacters)) Extra whitespace between && *
Michael Saboff
Comment 4 2011-12-01 22:35:08 PST
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 117475 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=117475&action=review > > Why 4 bytes and not 8 on 64-bit architectures? Can this share code with StringHash.h instead of adding more copies of code that does the same thing? > > > Source/JavaScriptCore/wtf/text/StringImpl.cpp:714 > > +#if !(CPU(ARM) || CPU(SH4) || CPU(MIPS) || CPU(SPARC)) > > StringHash.h uses a different list for this. Spent more time on this and added 64 bit comparisons for x86-64. This change sped up SunSpider string-unpack-code by ~3%. Made an initial stab at merging the StringHash code with this code, but it proved to be more work than expected. Putting the new equal() implementations in StringImpl.h and calling them from StringHash.h didn't work. The compiler tried to convert the first argument LChar* to a String which ended up with a recursive call. Created https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73622 "Eliminate Duplicate word at a time equal code in StringImpl.cpp and StringHash.h" to address this duplicity.
Michael Saboff
Comment 5 2011-12-01 23:06:56 PST
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.