Bug 61396 - [GTK] implement eventSender.scalePageBy
Summary: [GTK] implement eventSender.scalePageBy
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 59082
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-24 14:32 PDT by Ryosuke Niwa
Modified: 2011-06-15 10:15 PDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryosuke Niwa 2011-05-24 14:32:52 PDT 
r83140 added eventSender.scalePageBy and several tests require this.
Comment 1 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-05-24 14:36:33 PDT 
Skipped test in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/87207
Comment 2 Martin Robinson 2011-06-15 09:08:08 PDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 59082 ***
Comment 3 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-06-15 09:15:38 PDT 
Martin, should we unskip fast/events/scroll-in-scaled-page-with-overflow-hidden.html then?  I swear the test was failing due to the lack of method when I added it to the skipped list.
Comment 4 Martin Robinson 2011-06-15 09:46:58 PDT 
This seems to be the issue: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36003 There's no implementation for eventSender.mouseScrollBy. I'll update the skipped list.
Comment 5 Ryosuke Niwa 2011-06-15 10:06:08 PDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> This seems to be the issue: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36003 There's no implementation for eventSender.mouseScrollBy. I'll update the skipped list.

Ah, ok.  Sorry about the confusion :(  Should have read the function name more carefully!
Comment 6 Martin Robinson 2011-06-15 10:15:56 PDT 
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > This seems to be the issue: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36003 There's no implementation for eventSender.mouseScrollBy. I'll update the skipped list.
> 
> Ah, ok.  Sorry about the confusion :(  Should have read the function name more carefully!

No worries! Thanks for filing the bug.