Bug 47098 - dump-as-markup conversion: editing/execCommand/format-block-with-braces.html and format-block.html
Summary: dump-as-markup conversion: editing/execCommand/format-block-with-braces.html ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML Editing (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: All All
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Ryosuke Niwa
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 19795
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2010-10-04 11:26 PDT by Ryosuke Niwa
Modified: 2010-10-05 14:38 PDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Patch (18.09 KB, patch)
2010-10-04 11:55 PDT, Ryosuke Niwa
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (39.86 KB, patch)
2010-10-04 12:13 PDT, Ryosuke Niwa
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (39.31 KB, patch)
2010-10-04 12:18 PDT, Ryosuke Niwa
tony: review+
Details | Formatted Diff | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-04 11:26:37 PDT
editing/execCommand/format-block.html should be converted to a dump-as-markup test since it's testing the DOM modifications done by execCommand("FormatBlock");
Comment 1 Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-04 11:55:03 PDT
Created attachment 69657 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-04 12:01:57 PDT
editing/execCommand/format-block-with-braces.html should be converted as well.
Comment 3 Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-04 12:13:00 PDT
Created attachment 69662 [details]
Patch
Comment 4 Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-04 12:18:59 PDT
Created attachment 69666 [details]
Patch
Comment 5 Tony Chang 2010-10-04 15:05:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 69666 [details]
Patch

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=69666&action=review

> LayoutTests/editing/execCommand/format-block-with-braces.html:3
> +<!DOCTYPE html>
> +<html>
> +<body>

I don't know if we have a policy on whether tests should have doctype, html or body tags.  I think on webkit-dev mjs said he likes the <!DOCTYPE html> tag because we want to be testing the standards compliant parser.  That said, since this is an existing test and it didn't have these tags originally, I kind of think the test should not have these tags (i.e., it's more like a regression test).

I don't have a strong opinion one way or another and it shouldn't matter at all for this test, so either is fine with me.
Comment 6 Ryosuke Niwa 2010-10-05 14:38:05 PDT
Committed r69147: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/69147>