WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 36702
[Qt] NPP_SetWindow seems to not be called when TestNetscapePlugin is moved
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36702
Summary
[Qt] NPP_SetWindow seems to not be called when TestNetscapePlugin is moved
Robert Hogan
Reported
2010-03-27 07:18:54 PDT
Created
attachment 51828
[details]
Test Case In the attached test, replacing window.addEventListener('load', doTest, false); with window.addEventListener('load', function() { window.setTimeout(doTest, 0); will cause the test to fail.
Attachments
Test Case
(1.45 KB, text/plain)
2010-03-27 07:18 PDT
,
Robert Hogan
no flags
Details
Patch
(3.88 KB, patch)
2010-06-14 14:40 PDT
,
Robert Hogan
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(5.22 KB, patch)
2010-06-19 13:02 PDT
,
Robert Hogan
hausmann
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1
2010-03-27 11:51:25 PDT
The test expectation is "should not crash". Are you saying that it crashes if doTest is deferred? Note that WebKit Qt component is for bugs in the WebKit Qt API layer.
Robert Hogan
Comment 2
2010-03-27 12:04:35 PDT
(In reply to
comment #1
)
> The test expectation is "should not crash". Are you saying that it crashes if > doTest is deferred? > > Note that WebKit Qt component is for bugs in the WebKit Qt API layer.
No, it times out in Qt. Note that you need to have the patch at
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36675
applied to encounter the bug.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 3
2010-03-27 14:10:59 PDT
This seems to imply that NPP_SetWindow is not called on plug-in if it's moved after initial layout. I think that's correct behavior for windowed plug-ins (but I'm not sure whether TestNetscapePlugin is windowed or windowless, particularly on Qt).
Balazs Kelemen
Comment 4
2010-06-03 05:49:39 PDT
Please clarify the situation: * is it crashing or just not working correctly? * is this the correct behavior as ap suggested or not?
Robert Hogan
Comment 5
2010-06-03 12:11:57 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> Please clarify the situation: > * is it crashing or just not working correctly? > * is this the correct behavior as ap suggested or not?
The two tests: LayoutTests/plugins/update-widgets-crash.html and LayoutTests/plugins/reentrant-update-widget-positions.html are the same except for that the former has: window.addEventListener('load', doTest, false); instead of window.addEventListener('load', function() { window.setTimeout(doTest, 0); LayoutTests/plugins/update-widgets-crash.html passes while LayoutTests/plugins/reentrant-update-widget-positions.html fails. It fails by timing out.
Robert Hogan
Comment 6
2010-06-14 14:40:53 PDT
Created
attachment 58702
[details]
Patch
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 7
2010-06-17 00:33:21 PDT
Comment on
attachment 58702
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 58702 Committed
r61311
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61311
>
WebKit Commit Bot
Comment 8
2010-06-17 00:33:26 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 9
2010-06-17 02:02:31 PDT
It was rolled out by
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61315
, because it make 2 tests fail:
http://build.webkit.org/results/Qt%20Linux%20Release/r61314%20%2813453%29/results.html
Robert Hogan
Comment 10
2010-06-17 10:35:38 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> It was rolled out by
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61315
, > because it make 2 tests fail: >
http://build.webkit.org/results/Qt%20Linux%20Release/r61314%20%2813453%29/results.html
That was sloppy, sorry. I'll look into this now.
Robert Hogan
Comment 11
2010-06-17 10:50:07 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> It was rolled out by
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61315
, > because it make 2 tests fail: >
http://build.webkit.org/results/Qt%20Linux%20Release/r61314%20%2813453%29/results.html
Qt expected results for resize-from-plugin.html were wrong anyway by the looks of it, the new results are slightly less wrong but still problematic. The mac expected result is: x: 18, y: 52, width: 200, height: 200, clipRect: (18, 52, 200, 142) Qt result was (without patch): x: 18, y: 54, width: 100, height: 100, clipRect: (0, 0, 100, 100) And with patch: x: 18, y: 54, width: 100, height: 100, clipRect: (0, 0, 200, 142) So closer, but still no cigar. The other test looks like a minor layout difference due to the extra resizing now taking place in DRT. So results just need to be updated when I land the corrected patch.
Robert Hogan
Comment 12
2010-06-19 13:02:47 PDT
Created
attachment 59192
[details]
Patch
Robert Hogan
Comment 13
2010-06-20 05:54:47 PDT
Committed
r61505
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/61505
>
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug