Bug 35670 - [Qt] QWebPage::createPlugin() visibility attribute ignored in Qt 4.5
Summary: [Qt] QWebPage::createPlugin() visibility attribute ignored in Qt 4.5
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 31203
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New Bugs (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Other OS X 10.5
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords: Qt
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-03 04:00 PST by Tor Arne Vestbø
Modified: 2010-03-12 06:34 PST (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tor Arne Vestbø 2010-03-03 04:00:14 PST 
This bug report originated from issue QTBUG-4864
http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-4864

--- Description ---

When porting our project from Qt Extended 4.4 to Qt for Embedded Linux 4.5.3, we found a discrepancy in visibility behavior with plugins created through QWebPage::createPlugin(). In Qt Extended 4.4.2, the visibility attribute in the <div> tag of an html file correctly hides a QLineEdit object. 

<p>In Qt for Embedded LInux 4.5.3, the visibility attribute seems to be ignored altogether, resulting in the QLineEdit object always being visible</p>
Comment 1 Antonio Gomes 2010-03-03 06:41:21 PST 
it seems really a dup of bug 35670, which have been fixed in trunk, but I do not think it was/will be backported to qt4.5 branch.

should we close it as DUP ?
Comment 2 Kent Hansen 2010-03-12 06:28:58 PST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> it seems really a dup of bug 35670, which have been fixed in trunk, but I do
> not think it was/will be backported to qt4.5 branch.

How can it be a duplicate of itself? :)
Comment 3 Antonio Gomes 2010-03-12 06:34:47 PST 
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > it seems really a dup of bug 35670, which have been fixed in trunk, but I do
> > not think it was/will be backported to qt4.5 branch.
> 
> How can it be a duplicate of itself? :)

:) good question. I mean bug 31203.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 31203 ***