WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 34049
ScrollbarTheme[Chromium]Mac.mm wrongly set scrollbar view size to page step size
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34049
Summary
ScrollbarTheme[Chromium]Mac.mm wrongly set scrollbar view size to page step size
Peter Kasting
Reported
2010-01-24 00:07:29 PST
In ScrollbarTheme[Chromium]Mac::paint(), we have the following line: trackInfo.trackInfo.scrollbar.viewsize = scrollbar->pageStep(); There is no documentation on what this member represents, other than header comments, and the ones in Appearance.h are not too enlightening: "The current view range size". I believe this is supposed to be the size of the visible area, and thus should be using scrollbar->visibleSize(). Using pageStep() meant that when
bug 32595
changed how far we travel when scrolling by page, the scroll thumb changed size, which is unexpected. Changing this to use visibleSize() will necessitate updating a number of layout test pixel baselines.
Attachments
patch v1 (no layout test updates)
(2.09 KB, patch)
2010-01-25 10:49 PST
,
Peter Kasting
mitz: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Layout test rebaselines
(
deleted
)
2010-01-25 18:02 PST
,
Peter Kasting
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Layout test rebaselines v2
(
deleted
)
2010-01-25 21:22 PST
,
Peter Kasting
mitz: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Peter Kasting
Comment 1
2010-01-25 10:49:47 PST
Created
attachment 47358
[details]
patch v1 (no layout test updates) Here's the actual fix. This doesn't change any test baselines. Note that the affected tests already don't match their baselines today.
Peter Kasting
Comment 2
2010-01-25 18:02:13 PST
Created
attachment 47380
[details]
Layout test rebaselines Here are the layout test rebaselines to go with the patch. There are also a few other tests I should mention: * The following tests have a pixel diff showing scroll thumb length changes, but are actually caused by some other pre-existing change, not my patch: * fast/block/margin-collapse/103.html * fast/inline/long-wrapped-line.html * fast/multicol/float-multicol.html * The following tests are affected by my change, but also already have other pixel diffs, so I won't rebaseline them to avoid papering over other regressions: * compositing/layers-inside-overflow-scroll.html * compositing/self-painting-layers.html * css1/font_properties/font_family.html * fast/box-shadow/basic-shadows.html * fast/forms/textarea-scrollbar.html
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 3
2010-01-25 18:37:23 PST
Seems like this would be a 2-second review for hyatt. I don't feel qualified here.
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 4
2010-01-25 18:40:35 PST
Hy-yatt! Hy-yatt! :)
mitz
Comment 5
2010-01-25 20:42:39 PST
Comment on
attachment 47380
[details]
Layout test rebaselines platform/mac/fast/overflow/line-clamp-expected.png platform/mac-leopard/compositing/overflow/overflow-positioning-expected.png and svg/custom/text-zoom-expected.png appear to be unrelated to your patch (the latter looks no different from what’s already checked in, I couldn’t discern any difference in the former either).
Peter Kasting
Comment 6
2010-01-25 21:22:12 PST
Created
attachment 47386
[details]
Layout test rebaselines v2 Good catches, all correct. Fixed.
mitz
Comment 7
2010-01-25 21:24:30 PST
Comment on
attachment 47386
[details]
Layout test rebaselines v2
> + * fast/repaint/inline-overflow-expected.png: > + * fast/repaint/inline-relative-positioned-expected.png: > + * fast/repaint/table-cell-overflow-expected.png: > + * fast/repaint/trailing-floats-root-line-box-overflow-expected.png:
These too.
Peter Kasting
Comment 8
2010-01-25 21:35:51 PST
Sigh, yes. Will fix before landing. Didn't even think of also checking outside platform/mac when I generated the new baselines. Sloppy. Sorry.
Peter Kasting
Comment 9
2010-01-25 21:58:12 PST
Landed both patches in
r53838
.
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 10
2011-03-28 15:23:40 PDT
***
Bug 23819
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug