I'm also renaming PolicyCheck to PolicyCallback in the same change (to more clearly distinguish it from PolicyChecker).
Created attachment 40838 [details] Patch v1
Created attachment 40840 [details] Patch v1
Created attachment 40842 [details] Patch v1
Comment on attachment 40842 [details] Patch v1 Should it really be "PolicyCallback"? and not "NavigationPolicyCallback" or "LoadPolicyCallback" or "LoaderPolicyCalback"? Our indent-in-headers policy is under discussion on webkit-dev, but this change complies to the current style guidelines, so is fine as-is. cq- given the question about the naming, but otherwise looks fine. You could reply with some naming justification and set cq+ yourself if you like.
(In reply to comment #4) > Should it really be "PolicyCallback"? and not "NavigationPolicyCallback" or > "LoadPolicyCallback" or "LoaderPolicyCalback"? NavigationPolicyCallback isn't right because Navigation is just one of the three things it does. LoadPolicyCallback or LoaderPolicyCalback would be fine. We can change the name later if we like. I just wanted to make it different from PolicyChecker in the short term.
Comment on attachment 40842 [details] Patch v1 I need to land this manually.
Committed r49290: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/49290>