Bug 29343 – Update WebGL-related copyrights

• Status: RESOLVED
• Resolution: LATER
• Component: WebGL

[Kenneth Russell]

Google contributed a significant amount of the code integrated by Apple in https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29010 , but I neglected to update the copyright headers in the affected files. On the recommendation of Apple here is a minor patch updating the relevant files' copyrights.

[Oliver Hunt]

(In reply to comment #0)
> Google contributed a significant amount of the code integrated by Apple in
> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29010 , but I neglected to update the
> copyright headers in the affected files. On the recommendation of Apple here is
> a minor patch updating the relevant files' copyrights.

Please list the "significant" code -- my understanding is that it was just the original implementations of Canvas*Array.

[Kenneth Russell]

The contributions were:
  - The original implementations of the Canvas*Array classes and their IDL
  - Updates to many of the CanvasRenderingContext3D entry points to bring them up to date with the then-current WebGL specification
  - Additions of the CanvasArray constructors to the DOMWindow IDL

These are the only files touched by the attached copyright notice patch.

[Oliver Hunt]

(In reply to comment #2)
> The contributions were:
>   - The original implementations of the Canvas*Array classes and their IDL
>   - Updates to many of the CanvasRenderingContext3D entry points to bring them
> up to date with the then-current WebGL specification
>   - Additions of the CanvasArray constructors to the DOMWindow IDL
> 
> These are the only files touched by the attached copyright notice patch.

I think the confusion here is that there is no patch attached :D

[Kenneth Russell]

Created attachment 39736 [details]
Patch updating copyrights to affected files. 

Sorry about that; attached.

[Oliver Hunt]

Comment on attachment 39736 [details]
Patch updating copyrights to affected files. 

I don't know what source files were modified, vs. started from fresh -- no point in me being the requested reviewer.

[Eric Seidel (no email)]

Comment on attachment 39736 [details]
Patch updating copyrights to affected files. 

No ChangeLog. r-
Why are we bothering to update this?  Lets just fix the copyrights next time we touch those files... no?

[Oliver Hunt]

Closing per eric's comments -- he's right, we normally just correct copyright notices when we modify files and realise that the copyright info is out of date.