Bug 232109 - Regression (r282150 - r282200?): [ macOS wk2 ] webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-candidates.html is a flaky failure
Summary: Regression (r282150 - r282200?): [ macOS wk2 ] webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-ca...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WebRTC (show other bugs)
Version: WebKit Nightly Build
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords: InRadar
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-10-21 15:07 PDT by ayumi_kojima
Modified: 2021-10-25 16:56 PDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description ayumi_kojima 2021-10-21 15:07:25 PDT
webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-candidates.html

Is flaky failing on macOS wk2.

History: https://results.webkit.org/?suite=layout-tests&test=webrtc%2Fdatachannel%2Fmdns-ice-candidates.html

Result page: https://build.webkit.org/results/Apple-BigSur-Debug-WK2-Tests/r284599%20(4393)/results.html

Diff:

--- /Volumes/Data/worker/bigsur-debug-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-candidates-expected.txt
+++ /Volumes/Data/worker/bigsur-debug-tests-wk2/build/layout-test-results/webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-candidates-actual.txt
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
 PASS Basic data channel exchange from offerer to receiver
 PASS Basic data channel exchange from receiver to offerer
 PASS Basic data channel exchange from offerer to receiver using UDP only
-PASS Basic data channel exchange from offerer to receiver 2
+FAIL Basic data channel exchange from offerer to receiver 2 promise_test: Unhandled rejection with value: "Test timed out"
 PASS Ensure that local description SDP filtering is correctly filtering mDNS local candidates
Comment 1 Radar WebKit Bug Importer 2021-10-21 15:09:13 PDT
<rdar://problem/84524913>
Comment 2 ayumi_kojima 2021-10-25 14:45:37 PDT
I was able to reproduce the failure locally at TOT using run-webkit-tests --force --iterations 500 --exit-after-n-failures 1 webrtc/datachannel/mdns-ice-candidates.html -f
Comment 3 ayumi_kojima 2021-10-25 16:56:43 PDT
The test failed with r282200 with the same diff and passed with r282150.

It seems the test has been flaky for long time with different diffs.

Lately the test just has been fixed for a different diff in r283235 (Bug 230700).