WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 171157
181495
Bugzilla should load EWS bubbles in chronological order
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=181495
Summary
Bugzilla should load EWS bubbles in chronological order
Aakash Jain
Reported
2018-01-10 13:46:40 PST
Bugzilla takes a long time to display EWS bubbles when there are multiple attachments/patches. Bugzilla loads the EWS bubbles for the oldest patch first. For bugs with large number of patches (e.g.: 10+), this might results in long time (10+s) to load the EWS bubble for the most recent patch. Bugzilla should load EWS bubbles in chronological order, so that the EWS bubbles for most recent patch is loaded first.
Attachments
Proposed patch
(1.37 KB, patch)
2018-01-10 13:49 PST
,
Aakash Jain
mcatanzaro
: review-
ews-watchlist
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from ews100 for mac-sierra
(2.45 MB, application/zip)
2018-01-10 22:38 PST
,
EWS Watchlist
no flags
Details
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Aakash Jain
Comment 1
2018-01-10 13:49:00 PST
Created
attachment 330957
[details]
Proposed patch
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 2
2018-01-10 15:01:26 PST
That's neat. Seems worth a heads up to webkit-dev, as this changes the order of attachments.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 3
2018-01-10 15:02:01 PST
Comment on
attachment 330957
[details]
Proposed patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=330957&action=review
> Websites/bugs.webkit.org/template/en/default/attachment/list.html.tmpl:56 > + [% FOREACH attachment = attachments.reverse %]
Need WEBKIT_CHANGES around this.
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 4
2018-01-10 15:14:56 PST
This totally changes the order of attachments? I'm not sure that is what bugzilla users would expect. Comments are First -> Last so I'd also expect Attachments to be First -> Last.
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 5
2018-01-10 15:19:02 PST
What about just not getting bubbles on obsolete patches?
> 152[%# if WEBKIT_CHANGES %] > 153 [% IF attachment.ispatch %] > 154 <div class="statusBubble"> > 155 <iframe src="
https://webkit-queues.webkit.org/status-bubble/
[% attachment.id %]" > 156 style="width: 600px; height: 20px; border: none;" scrolling="no"> > 157 </iframe> > 158 </div> > 159 [% END %] > 160[%# endif // WEBKIT_CHANGES %]
Changing: - [% IF attachment.ispatch %] + [% IF attachment.ispatch && !attachment.isobsolete %]
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 6
2018-01-10 15:20:45 PST
I frequently want to see complete history of EWS, even on obsoleted patches.
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 7
2018-01-10 15:21:17 PST
(In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from
comment #6
)
> I frequently want to see complete history of EWS, even on obsoleted patches.
You can make the attachment unobsolete in order to see that info.
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 8
2018-01-10 15:21:31 PST
(In reply to Joseph Pecoraro from
comment #7
)
> (In reply to Alexey Proskuryakov from
comment #6
) > > I frequently want to see complete history of EWS, even on obsoleted patches. > > You can make the attachment unobsolete in order to see that info.
Or just viewing the Details page should show it, right?
Joseph Pecoraro
Comment 9
2018-01-10 15:21:45 PST
Is this bug a duplicate of
bug 171157
? <
https://webkit.org/b/171157
> EWS Bubbles take a long time to show up - wasting time getting bubbles on obsolete, hidden, patches
EWS Watchlist
Comment 10
2018-01-10 22:38:47 PST
Comment on
attachment 330957
[details]
Proposed patch
Attachment 330957
[details]
did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output:
http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/6030294
New failing tests: imported/w3c/web-platform-tests/media-source/mediasource-config-change-mp4-av-video-bitrate.html
EWS Watchlist
Comment 11
2018-01-10 22:38:49 PST
Created
attachment 331030
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ews100 for mac-sierra The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-ews. Bot: ews100 Port: mac-sierra Platform: Mac OS X 10.12.6
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 12
2018-01-15 13:01:18 PST
Comment on
attachment 330957
[details]
Proposed patch While this is clever, it's too heavy-handed IMO. This should be fixable without changing the attachment sort order. I agree this is a largely dup of
bug #171157
.
Michael Catanzaro
Comment 13
2018-01-15 13:01:27 PST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
bug 171157
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug