Measure how common it is for content to deal with WebGL context loss.
<rdar://problem/29883469>
Created attachment 298403 [details] WIP Patch
Created attachment 299614 [details] Patch
<rdar://problem/30171195>
Created attachment 299616 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 299616 [details] Patch Attachment 299616 [details] did not pass mac-debug-ews (mac): Output: http://webkit-queues.webkit.org/results/2942573 New failing tests: media/modern-media-controls/tracks-support/tracks-support-show-panel-fullscreen.html
Created attachment 299628 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ews113 for mac-elcapitan The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the mac-debug-ews. Bot: ews113 Port: mac-elcapitan Platform: Mac OS X 10.11.6
Comment on attachment 299616 [details] Patch r=me Should we also measure how often a contextLoss handler would have been called if it were present/is called if it is present?
(In reply to comment #8) > Comment on attachment 299616 [details] > Patch > > r=me > Should we also measure how often a contextLoss handler would have been > called if it were present/is called if it is present? I don't think this is important at the moment. What we want to know is would it be safe for us to take away / restore the WebGL context and rely on the pages dealing with context loss via those event handlers.
Comment on attachment 299616 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 299616 Committed r211151: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/211151>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.