Since EFL 1.8, E_Dbus is deprecated. Now we depends E_Dbus because of Battery Status and we can use eldbus instead of E_Dbus for it.
Created attachment 237335 [details] WorkInProgress
Created attachment 241815 [details] Patch
Created attachment 241818 [details] Patch
gyuyoung, could you review this?
Comment on attachment 241818 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=241818&action=review Patch looks fine to me. However I feel I need to take a look this patch further. Let me do it tomorrow. > Source/WebCore/platform/efl/BatteryProviderEfl.cpp:158 > + if (type != 2) // BATTERY I don't understand What does "// BATTERY" comment means. > Source/WebCore/platform/efl/BatteryProviderEfl.cpp:181 > + Eldbus_Object* object = eldbus_object_get(static_cast<BatteryProviderEfl*>(data)->connection(), BUS, path); Don't we need to check if object is null ?
Created attachment 242260 [details] rebased
(In reply to comment #5) > Comment on attachment 241818 [details] > Patch > > View in context: > https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=241818&action=review > > Patch looks fine to me. However I feel I need to take a look this patch > further. Let me do it tomorrow. > > > Source/WebCore/platform/efl/BatteryProviderEfl.cpp:158 > > + if (type != 2) // BATTERY > > I don't understand What does "// BATTERY" comment means. > > > Source/WebCore/platform/efl/BatteryProviderEfl.cpp:181 > > + Eldbus_Object* object = eldbus_object_get(static_cast<BatteryProviderEfl*>(data)->connection(), BUS, path); > > Don't we need to check if object is null ? Sure, rebased with what you addressed.
Comment on attachment 242260 [details] rebased LGTM.
Comment on attachment 242260 [details] rebased Clearing flags on attachment: 242260 Committed r176555: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/176555>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
*** Bug 101866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***