There's no need in keeping all of them in one file.
Created attachment 232352 [details] Cleanup and fixes one bug along the way
Created attachment 232353 [details] Revised the change log entry
Comment on attachment 232353 [details] Revised the change log entry View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=232353&action=review > PerformanceTests/DoYouEvenBench/resources/main.js:3 > +(function () { > + > +var values = []; I've purposefully kept this unintended so that I can do the planned refactoring in the next patch without completely messing up the diff.
Comment on attachment 232353 [details] Revised the change log entry View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=232353&action=review >> PerformanceTests/DoYouEvenBench/resources/main.js:3 >> +var values = []; > > I've purposefully kept this unintended so that I can do the planned refactoring in the next patch without completely messing up the diff. Namely, I'd like to move all these local variables into benchmarkClient and avoid using the closure altogether.
Comment on attachment 232353 [details] Revised the change log entry View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=232353&action=review > PerformanceTests/DoYouEvenBench/Full.html:11 > + <script src="resources/main.js"></script> > + <script src="resources/benchmark-runner.js"></script> > + <script src="resources/benchmark-report.js"></script> > + <script src="../resources/statistics.js"></script> > + <script src="resources/tests.js"></script> Can anything be made async/defer?
(In reply to comment #5) > (From update of attachment 232353 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=232353&action=review > > > PerformanceTests/DoYouEvenBench/Full.html:11 > > + <script src="resources/main.js"></script> > > + <script src="resources/benchmark-runner.js"></script> > > + <script src="resources/benchmark-report.js"></script> > > + <script src="../resources/statistics.js"></script> > > + <script src="resources/tests.js"></script> > > Can anything be made async/defer? Sure, we can use defer. Thanks for the review!
Committed r169516: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/169516>