WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
123138
Add a cross-platform IDBRecordIdentifier
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123138
Summary
Add a cross-platform IDBRecordIdentifier
Brady Eidson
Reported
2013-10-21 23:06:44 PDT
Add a cross-platform IDBRecordIdentifier Turns out it's already a cross platform concept. Just need the right header and other code changes to adapt. More work towards
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123027
Attachments
Patch v1
(36.25 KB, patch)
2013-10-21 23:13 PDT
,
Brady Eidson
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch v2
(37.69 KB, patch)
2013-10-22 09:49 PDT
,
Brady Eidson
kling
: review+
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Brady Eidson
Comment 1
2013-10-21 23:13:01 PDT
Created
attachment 214820
[details]
Patch v1
Andreas Kling
Comment 2
2013-10-22 09:14:18 PDT
Comment on
attachment 214820
[details]
Patch v1 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=214820&action=review
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBBackingStoreInterface.h:71 > + virtual const IDBRecordIdentifier* recordIdentifier() const = 0;
Why is this a pointer instead now? Will it ever be null?
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBBackingStoreLevelDB.cpp:947 > + ASSERT(recordIdentifier);
It would be nicer to pass the IDBRecordIdentifier here by reference. Then you wouldn't need this ugly assertion..
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBBackingStoreLevelDB.cpp:1195 > + ASSERT(recordIdentifier);
It would be nicer to pass the IDBRecordIdentifier here by reference. Then you wouldn't need this ugly assertion..
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBObjectStoreBackendLevelDB.cpp:66 > + ASSERT(recordIdentifier);
It would be nicer to pass the IDBRecordIdentifier here by reference. Then you wouldn't need this ugly assertion..
Brady Eidson
Comment 3
2013-10-22 09:24:06 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 214820
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=214820&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/IDBBackingStoreInterface.h:71 > > + virtual const IDBRecordIdentifier* recordIdentifier() const = 0; > > Why is this a pointer instead now? Will it ever be null?
I forgot ptr->reference is your thing. It might be null, in that previously it might have been a default constructed object representing nothing. I'll see if I can make it back to a reference...
Brady Eidson
Comment 4
2013-10-22 09:49:31 PDT
Created
attachment 214866
[details]
Patch v2
Andreas Kling
Comment 5
2013-10-22 09:57:08 PDT
Comment on
attachment 214866
[details]
Patch v2 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=214866&action=review
Okay. r=me Looking forward to your "fix all of this terrible code" refactor :)
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBBackingStoreLevelDB.cpp:1643 > + virtual const IDBRecordIdentifier& recordIdentifier() const OVERRIDE { ASSERT_NOT_REACHED(); return *(m_recordIdentifier.get()); }
return *m_recordIdentifier;
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBBackingStoreLevelDB.cpp:1734 > + virtual const IDBRecordIdentifier& recordIdentifier() const OVERRIDE { ASSERT_NOT_REACHED(); return *(m_recordIdentifier.get()); }
return *m_recordIdentifier;
> Source/WebCore/Modules/indexeddb/leveldb/IDBBackingStoreLevelDB.h:117 > + virtual const IDBRecordIdentifier& recordIdentifier() const OVERRIDE { return *(m_recordIdentifier.get()); }
return *m_recordIdentifier;
Brady Eidson
Comment 6
2013-10-22 10:07:07 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/157798
Brady Eidson
Comment 7
2013-10-22 10:07:39 PDT
(In reply to
comment #5
)
> (From update of
attachment 214866
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=214866&action=review
> > Okay. r=me > > Looking forward to your "fix all of this terrible code" refactor :)
Me too, brother, me too.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug