WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED WONTFIX
103768
REGRESSION(
r136142
): break a bunch of interactive_ui_tests in chromium win (Requested by zhenyao_home on #webkit).
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103768
Summary
REGRESSION(r136142): break a bunch of interactive_ui_tests in chromium win (R...
WebKit Review Bot
Reported
2012-11-30 13:19:50 PST
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/136142
broke the build: break a bunch of interactive_ui_tests in chromium win (Requested by zhenyao_home on #webkit). This is an automatic bug report generated by the sheriff-bot. If this bug report was created because of a flaky test, please file a bug for the flaky test (if we don't already have one on file) and dup this bug against that bug so that we can track how often these flaky tests case pain. "Only you can prevent forest fires." -- Smokey the Bear
Attachments
ROLLOUT of r136142
(38.27 KB, patch)
2012-11-30 13:20 PST
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 1
2012-11-30 13:20:35 PST
Created
attachment 177017
[details]
ROLLOUT of
r136142
Any committer can land this patch automatically by marking it commit-queue+. The commit-queue will build and test the patch before landing to ensure that the rollout will be successful. This process takes approximately 15 minutes. If you would like to land the rollout faster, you can use the following command: webkit-patch land-attachment ATTACHMENT_ID where ATTACHMENT_ID is the ID of this attachment.
Zhenyao Mo
Comment 2
2012-11-30 13:37:13 PST
Roll webkit to 136141, the tests run OK:
https://codereview.chromium.org/11316282/
Roll webkit to 136142, the tests start to fail:
https://codereview.chromium.org/11299280/
136143 is definitely innocent:
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/136143
So it's clear this patch causes the failure. We have 140+ patches piling up waiting to be rolled into chromium. So I am rolling this out for now. More than happy to help investigate, but definitely not while I am gardener.
Zhenyao Mo
Comment 3
2012-11-30 13:44:03 PST
Some more results: roll to 136140, always pass:
https://codereview.chromium.org/11348329/
and
https://codereview.chromium.org/11428108/
roll to 136144, fail:
https://codereview.chromium.org/11416290/
roll to 136145, fail:
https://codereview.chromium.org/11428109/
It seems clear to me 136142 caused the failures
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4
2012-11-30 13:55:43 PST
Comment on
attachment 177017
[details]
ROLLOUT of
r136142
Clearing flags on attachment: 177017 Committed
r136275
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/136275
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5
2012-11-30 13:55:47 PST
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Zhenyao Mo
Comment 6
2012-11-30 15:31:23 PST
After more investigation, the failures seem to be fixed between range
r136200
&
r136220
. If I can confirm this, will land this patch again, but definitely after I rolled 140+ webkit into chromium.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 7
2012-12-07 11:42:30 PST
Can this patch be rolled back in?
Zhenyao Mo
Comment 8
2012-12-07 13:28:36 PST
I am still not very comfortable with this patch, but I'll try to roll it back in on Monday.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 9
2012-12-11 10:13:29 PST
Ping?
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 10
2012-12-11 11:55:37 PST
First off, I don't think you should be rolling out patches just because tests in some project that uses WebKit (Chromium) failed without giving out enough details as to why this is a serious regression that requires an immediate roll out. Second, being busy rolling DEPS is not a good excuse to roll out a patch. Third, please re-land patches as fast as you would roll out patches once they are found not innocent of causing test failures.
Ryosuke Niwa
Comment 11
2012-12-11 14:08:25 PST
I'm relanding the patch.
Zhenyao Mo
Comment 12
2012-12-12 10:47:34 PST
Sorry about that. I planned to roll it in, and has been sick for the past a few days ... Still sick, so if you can help with relanding, I'd appreciate that
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug