Bug 102922 - [WTR] css-device-adapt layout tests testing relative units fail on WTR but pass on the MiniBrowser
Summary: [WTR] css-device-adapt layout tests testing relative units fail on WTR but pa...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 103428
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tools / Tests (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Nobody
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 95959 103090
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-11-21 05:05 PST by Jussi Kukkonen (jku)
Modified: 2012-11-27 09:50 PST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jussi Kukkonen (jku) 2012-11-21 05:05:24 PST 
FAIL CSS Test: @viewport constrained - width 200% assert_equals: expected 1600 but got 1960(stack: assert@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:1646
assert_equals@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:567
file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-006.xhtml:69
step@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:876
onload@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-006.xhtml:68)

FAIL CSS Test: @viewport constrained - width 50% assert_equals: expected 400 but got 490(stack: assert@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:1646
assert_equals@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:567
file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-007.xhtml:69
step@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:876
onload@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-007.xhtml:68)

These tests were enabled in bug 102868 based on bug 102517 "[WTR] WebKitTestRunner should be able to run tests using fixed layout".
Comment 1 Kenneth Rohde Christiansen 2012-11-23 05:51:58 PST 
Any idea Thiago?
Comment 2 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-23 06:11:18 PST 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Any idea Thiago?

This was a regression and was a somehow fixed by bug 102971.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 102971 ***
Comment 3 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-26 07:59:14 PST 
Started failing after bug 103090 landed.
Comment 4 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-27 09:50:54 PST 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103428 ***