RESOLVED FIXED 100780
test-webkitpy: fix import of coverage so that it works in a clean install
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100780
Summary test-webkitpy: fix import of coverage so that it works in a clean install
Dirk Pranke
Reported 2012-10-30 12:22:10 PDT
test-webkitpy: fix import of coverage so that it works in a clean install
Attachments
Patch (3.78 KB, patch)
2012-10-30 12:23 PDT, Dirk Pranke
no flags
refactor tests a bit (3.78 KB, patch)
2012-10-30 14:33 PDT, Dirk Pranke
no flags
update w/ review feedback (9.01 KB, patch)
2012-10-30 15:40 PDT, Dirk Pranke
tony: review+
Dirk Pranke
Comment 1 2012-10-30 12:23:08 PDT
Dirk Pranke
Comment 2 2012-10-30 12:24:14 PDT
I'm not actually sure if this is the best way to fix this, or if it would be better to move coverage down a directory and put webkitpy/thirdparty/autoinstalled/coverage into sys.path, to minimize other potential conflicts. Thoughts?
Dirk Pranke
Comment 3 2012-10-30 14:21:14 PDT
Comment on attachment 171499 [details] Patch reworking a bit ... hang on.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 4 2012-10-30 14:33:10 PDT
Created attachment 171519 [details] refactor tests a bit
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 5 2012-10-30 14:39:38 PDT
Comment on attachment 171519 [details] refactor tests a bit View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171519&action=review > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:130 > + installed_something = installer.install(url="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-3.5.1.tar.gz#md5=410d4c8155a4dab222f2bc51212d4a24", url_subpath="coverage-3.5.1/coverage") installed_something? Ah it's a bool? > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:132 > + if not _AUTOINSTALLED_DIR in sys.path: > + sys.path.append(_AUTOINSTALLED_DIR) Wow. Nasty. You might want to document this hack with a comment.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 6 2012-10-30 14:55:00 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > (From update of attachment 171519 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171519&action=review > > > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:130 > > + installed_something = installer.install(url="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-3.5.1.tar.gz#md5=410d4c8155a4dab222f2bc51212d4a24", url_subpath="coverage-3.5.1/coverage") > > installed_something? Ah it's a bool? > Yes. This tracks whether installer.install() actually did work, and is used by autoinstall_everything() in test-webkitpy to see if we need to run the unit tests serial to get around some really weird bugs I hit a few months ago. > > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:132 > > + if not _AUTOINSTALLED_DIR in sys.path: > > + sys.path.append(_AUTOINSTALLED_DIR) > > Wow. Nasty. You might want to document this hack with a comment. Sure, can do.
Tony Chang
Comment 7 2012-10-30 15:07:50 PDT
Comment on attachment 171519 [details] refactor tests a bit View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171519&action=review >>> Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:130 >>> + installed_something = installer.install(url="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-3.5.1.tar.gz#md5=410d4c8155a4dab222f2bc51212d4a24", url_subpath="coverage-3.5.1/coverage") >> >> installed_something? Ah it's a bool? > > Yes. This tracks whether installer.install() actually did work, and is used by autoinstall_everything() in test-webkitpy to see if we need to run the unit tests serial to get around some really weird bugs I hit a few months ago. I think Eric is saying the naming is confusing. Maybe call it successfully_installed or has_successfully_installed_coverage.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 8 2012-10-30 15:10:10 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 171519 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171519&action=review > > >>> Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:130 > >>> + installed_something = installer.install(url="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-3.5.1.tar.gz#md5=410d4c8155a4dab222f2bc51212d4a24", url_subpath="coverage-3.5.1/coverage") > >> > >> installed_something? Ah it's a bool? > > > > Yes. This tracks whether installer.install() actually did work, and is used by autoinstall_everything() in test-webkitpy to see if we need to run the unit tests serial to get around some really weird bugs I hit a few months ago. > > I think Eric is saying the naming is confusing. Maybe call it successfully_installed or has_successfully_installed_coverage. Neither of those names is very good IMO because the routine returns False if the package is already installed (and also, we use the same variable name throughout the file for consistency, so I wouldn't want to necessarily make it specific to the package name). I could rename it to has_installed_something or did_install_something ... WDYT of those?
Tony Chang
Comment 9 2012-10-30 15:17:13 PDT
Comment on attachment 171519 [details] refactor tests a bit View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171519&action=review >>>>> Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/thirdparty/__init__.py:130 >>>>> + installed_something = installer.install(url="http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/c/coverage/coverage-3.5.1.tar.gz#md5=410d4c8155a4dab222f2bc51212d4a24", url_subpath="coverage-3.5.1/coverage") >>>> >>>> installed_something? Ah it's a bool? >>> >>> Yes. This tracks whether installer.install() actually did work, and is used by autoinstall_everything() in test-webkitpy to see if we need to run the unit tests serial to get around some really weird bugs I hit a few months ago. >> >> I think Eric is saying the naming is confusing. Maybe call it successfully_installed or has_successfully_installed_coverage. > > Neither of those names is very good IMO because the routine returns False if the package is already installed (and also, we use the same variable name throughout the file for consistency, so I wouldn't want to necessarily make it specific to the package name). I could rename it to has_installed_something or did_install_something ... WDYT of those? has_installed_something or has_installed_coverage would be fine with me.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 10 2012-10-30 15:40:18 PDT
Created attachment 171536 [details] update w/ review feedback
Tony Chang
Comment 11 2012-10-30 15:57:35 PDT
Comment on attachment 171536 [details] update w/ review feedback View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171536&action=review > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/test/main_unittest.py:81 > + out, err = proc.communicate() Nit: err -> _ since it's not used.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 12 2012-10-30 16:14:12 PDT
(In reply to comment #11) > (From update of attachment 171536 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=171536&action=review > > > Tools/Scripts/webkitpy/test/main_unittest.py:81 > > + out, err = proc.communicate() > > Nit: err -> _ since it's not used. Will do.
Dirk Pranke
Comment 13 2012-10-30 16:17:51 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.