RESOLVED FIXED 100413
[cg] RenderBlock::selectionGaps() is extremely slow when there are many floats
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100413
Summary [cg] RenderBlock::selectionGaps() is extremely slow when there are many floats
mitz
Reported 2012-10-25 14:11:19 PDT
<rdar://problem/12544626> To reproduce: navigate to the URL and select one of the category names in red.
Attachments
Add GraphicsContext::clipOut(Vector<IntRect>&) and deploy it in RenderBlock::selectionGaps() (10.02 KB, patch)
2012-10-25 14:20 PDT, mitz
adele: review+
Remove an unnecessary call to CGContextGetClipBoundingBox from GraphicsContext::clipOut() (1.64 KB, patch)
2012-10-25 15:12 PDT, mitz
andersca: review+
mitz
Comment 1 2012-10-25 14:20:36 PDT
Created attachment 170730 [details] Add GraphicsContext::clipOut(Vector<IntRect>&) and deploy it in RenderBlock::selectionGaps()
Darin Adler
Comment 2 2012-10-25 14:30:03 PDT
Comment on attachment 170730 [details] Add GraphicsContext::clipOut(Vector<IntRect>&) and deploy it in RenderBlock::selectionGaps() View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=170730&action=review I’m OK with this, but I suspect there may be two other variations that work equally well or perhaps even better. > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > + RenderBlock::selectionGaps() calls GraphicsContext::clipOut(const IntRect&) for each float. > + With Core Graphics, A function that takes a vector of rectangles and clips them all out at > + once is faster than multiple calls to the function that clips out a single rectangle. Is the issue here the performance of repeatedly calling the CGContextGetClipBoundingBox function? If so, could we fix this performance issue another way by simply using a wide open rectangle instead of calling CGContextGetClipBoundingBox? > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cg/GraphicsContextCG.cpp:1080 > + CGContextBeginPath(context); > + CGContextAddRects(context, cgRects, 2); > + CGContextEOClip(context); Can the calls to CGContextBeginPath and CGContextEOClip be moved outside the loop? I don’t entirely understand the semantics here, but if all the rectangles are exclusive or'ed with each other, it seems that it could all be done with a single path.
mitz
Comment 3 2012-10-25 14:46:56 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > (From update of attachment 170730 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=170730&action=review > > I’m OK with this, but I suspect there may be two other variations that work equally well or perhaps even better. > > > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:10 > > + RenderBlock::selectionGaps() calls GraphicsContext::clipOut(const IntRect&) for each float. > > + With Core Graphics, A function that takes a vector of rectangles and clips them all out at > > + once is faster than multiple calls to the function that clips out a single rectangle. > > Is the issue here the performance of repeatedly calling the CGContextGetClipBoundingBox function? That’s the most expensive part. There’s also some function call overhead, but I didn’t profile this so I don’t know if it’s significant. > > If so, could we fix this performance issue another way by simply using a wide open rectangle instead of calling CGContextGetClipBoundingBox? I am going to try that. > > Source/WebCore/platform/graphics/cg/GraphicsContextCG.cpp:1080 > > + CGContextBeginPath(context); > > + CGContextAddRects(context, cgRects, 2); > > + CGContextEOClip(context); > > Can the calls to CGContextBeginPath and CGContextEOClip be moved outside the loop? I don’t entirely understand the semantics here, but if all the rectangles are exclusive or'ed with each other, it seems that it could all be done with a single path. We’d need to know that all rects in the input vector are pairwise disjoint.
mitz
Comment 4 2012-10-25 15:12:54 PDT
Created attachment 170741 [details] Remove an unnecessary call to CGContextGetClipBoundingBox from GraphicsContext::clipOut()
mitz
Comment 5 2012-10-25 17:05:38 PDT
Nate Whetsell
Comment 6 2012-11-16 18:30:23 PST
*** Bug 39380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.