| Summary: | [Qt] compositing tests need rebaseline with new testfonts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | WebKit | Reporter: | Balazs Kelemen <kbalazs> | ||||
| Component: | Tools / Tests | Assignee: | Balazs Kelemen <kbalazs> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Normal | CC: | eric.carlson, feature-media-reviews, webkit.review.bot | ||||
| Priority: | P2 | ||||||
| Version: | 528+ (Nightly build) | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 85203 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Balazs Kelemen
2012-07-13 06:34:56 PDT
Created attachment 152267 [details] patch I'm a bit confused. The tar Ossy created contained expectations in the generic platform/qt directory that are not exist currently. I checked Ossy's results with the rebaseline-server and every result was good. However, after I unskip the tests I still have font differences locally - a few with WebKit2 (13) and more with WebKit1 (34). Anyway I'm uploading this as I really curios whether I did what Ossy was planning or I did something wrong. The patch also contains pixel results because all of them was good too, so snapshot pixels (bug 90394) should be the same. Anyway, we should double-check this test (probably on bots) before checking in. Comment on attachment 152267 [details]
patch
Just baseline update, don't need review.
Landed in http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/122722 |