Bug 102922

Summary:	[WTR] css-device-adapt layout tests testing relative units fail on WTR but pass on the MiniBrowser
Product:	WebKit	Reporter:	Jussi Kukkonen (jku) <jussi.kukkonen>
Component:	Tools / Tests	Assignee:	Nobody <webkit-unassigned>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	Normal	CC:	abecsi, kenneth, mikhail.pozdnyakov, tmpsantos
Priority:	P2
Version:	528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	95959, 103090

Description Jussi Kukkonen (jku) 2012-11-21 05:05:24 PST

FAIL CSS Test: @viewport constrained - width 200% assert_equals: expected 1600 but got 1960(stack: assert@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:1646
assert_equals@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:567
file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-006.xhtml:69
step@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:876
onload@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-006.xhtml:68)

FAIL CSS Test: @viewport constrained - width 50% assert_equals: expected 400 but got 490(stack: assert@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:1646
assert_equals@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:567
file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-007.xhtml:69
step@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/resources/testharness.js:876
onload@file:///home/jku/intel/src/WebKit/LayoutTests/css3/device-adapt/opera/constrain-007.xhtml:68)

These tests were enabled in bug 102868 based on bug 102517 "[WTR] WebKitTestRunner should be able to run tests using fixed layout".

Comment 1 Kenneth Rohde Christiansen 2012-11-23 05:51:58 PST

Any idea Thiago?

Comment 2 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-23 06:11:18 PST

(In reply to comment #1)
> Any idea Thiago?

This was a regression and was a somehow fixed by bug 102971.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 102971 ***

Comment 3 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-26 07:59:14 PST

Started failing after bug 103090 landed.

Comment 4 Thiago Marcos P. Santos 2012-11-27 09:50:54 PST


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 103428 ***