RESOLVED FIXED 99457
Web Inspector: NMI provide data for mixing with tcmalloc heap dumps
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99457
Summary Web Inspector: NMI provide data for mixing with tcmalloc heap dumps
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Reported 2012-10-16 05:22:36 PDT
Early we used tcmalloc heap dumps for check what classes have to be instrumented first. We instrumented a lot of classes and it became difficult to use heap dumps for this task. We need a way to see the classes that aren't instrumented yet or their objects were not reached during snapshot. We could use heap dump but need to mix tcmalloc data with the data about already counted objects.
Attachments
Patch (23.71 KB, patch)
2012-10-16 05:58 PDT, Ilya Tikhonovsky
no flags
Patch (22.65 KB, patch)
2012-10-17 09:08 PDT, Ilya Tikhonovsky
no flags
Patch (20.38 KB, patch)
2012-10-17 09:18 PDT, Ilya Tikhonovsky
yurys: review+
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 1 2012-10-16 05:58:59 PDT
Rik Cabanier
Comment 2 2012-10-16 09:39:04 PDT
Please wait for approval from abarth@webkit.org, dglazkov@chromium.org, fishd@chromium.org, jamesr@chromium.org or tkent@chromium.org before submitting, as this patch contains changes to the Chromium public API. See also https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/ChromiumWebKitAPI.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 3 2012-10-17 08:09:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 168932 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=168932&action=review > Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:66 > + virtual size_t visitObject(const void* ptr) = 0; Please use separate interface for this.
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 4 2012-10-17 09:08:49 PDT
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 5 2012-10-17 09:18:57 PDT
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 6 2012-10-17 09:20:48 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 168932 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=168932&action=review > > > Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:66 > > + virtual size_t visitObject(const void* ptr) = 0; > > Please use separate interface for this. comments addressed
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 7 2012-10-17 09:35:48 PDT
Comment on attachment 169194 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=169194&action=review > Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:78 > + virtual void dumpUncountedObjects(const ObjectInfoProvider*) { } dumpAllocatedObjects?
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 8 2012-10-17 11:26:39 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 169194 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=169194&action=review > > > Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:78 > > + virtual void dumpUncountedObjects(const ObjectInfoProvider*) { } > > dumpAllocatedObjects? I am sure that we do not want to print all the allocated objects. Thus, the current name better suits for this purpose.
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 9 2012-10-18 01:18:43 PDT
Comment on attachment 169194 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=169194&action=review > Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:72 > + class ObjectInfoProvider { Maybe rename ObjectInfoProvider to InstrumentedObjects?
Vsevolod Vlasov
Comment 10 2012-10-18 01:21:41 PDT
Comment on attachment 169194 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=169194&action=review >>> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:78 >>> + virtual void dumpUncountedObjects(const ObjectInfoProvider*) { } >> >> dumpAllocatedObjects? > > I am sure that we do not want to print all the allocated objects. > Thus, the current name better suits for this purpose. dumpUncountedAllocatedObjects then?
Vsevolod Vlasov
Comment 11 2012-10-18 01:23:01 PDT
Comment on attachment 169194 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=169194&action=review >> Source/WebKit/chromium/public/WebDevToolsAgentClient.h:72 >> + class ObjectInfoProvider { > > Maybe rename ObjectInfoProvider to InstrumentedObjects? AllocatedObjectSizeProvider?
Ilya Tikhonovsky
Comment 12 2012-10-19 00:45:32 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.