CLOSED INVALID 9932
[Drosera] Loading www.t-com.de with Drosera attached takes too long
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9932
Summary [Drosera] Loading www.t-com.de with Drosera attached takes too long
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Reported 2006-07-15 09:27:03 PDT
Steps to reproduce: 1. Open URL in Safari:  http://www.t-com.de 2. Start Drosera and attach to Safari. 3. Click "reload" on the www.t-com.de web page. Expected results: The page should reload in under a minute (or less). Actual results: The page takes 3-5 minutes to reload (ball-park estimate; did not time it). Notes: Tested with locally-built WebKit r15455 and Safari 2.0.4 (419.3) on Mac OS X 10.4.7 (8J135/PowerPC).
Attachments
Example image 1 (580.71 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-07-15 14:04 PDT, Timothy Hatcher
no flags
Example image 2 (120.73 KB, image/jpeg)
2006-07-15 14:05 PDT, Timothy Hatcher
no flags
Sample of Drosera using debug WebKit while attached to Safari (49.67 KB, application/x-gzip)
2006-07-25 21:26 PDT, Mark Rowe (bdash)
no flags
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 1 2006-07-15 13:30:38 PDT
Actually, it doesn't matter if it's a reload or an initial load--both take a long time to complete.
Timothy Hatcher
Comment 2 2006-07-15 14:04:45 PDT
Created attachment 9469 [details] Example image 1
Timothy Hatcher
Comment 3 2006-07-15 14:05:29 PDT
Created attachment 9470 [details] Example image 2
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 4 2006-07-15 14:20:39 PDT
Comment on attachment 9469 [details] Example image 1 This was meant for Bug 9931.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 5 2006-07-15 14:20:55 PDT
Comment on attachment 9470 [details] Example image 2 This was meant for Bug 9931.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 6 2006-07-25 19:07:37 PDT
David, can you still reproduce this? The URL takes roughly 20 seconds to load for me with r15633 and Drosera attached, compared to around 5 seconds without Drosera.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 7 2006-07-25 20:40:08 PDT
(In reply to comment #6) > David, can you still reproduce this? The URL takes roughly 20 seconds to load > for me with r15633 and Drosera attached, compared to around 5 seconds without > Drosera. With a local DEBUG build of WebKit r15633, I let it run over 15 minutes before killing it. Drosera consumed 85-90% of the CPU the whole time it was running, and both Safari and Drosera were labeled as "not responding" off and on during that time in the Activity Monitor. I will try with a nightly build next.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 8 2006-07-25 21:02:27 PDT
My initial test was with the r15633 nightly, but a test with a debug build of WebKit r15637 and a release build in Drosera gave similar results: around 40 seconds to load. Using debug builds of WebKit in both Drosera and Safari resulted in horribly slow performance like you observed: closer to four minutes loading the page. I guess Shark or `sample' output is the next step.
Mark Rowe (bdash)
Comment 9 2006-07-25 21:26:47 PDT
Created attachment 9689 [details] Sample of Drosera using debug WebKit while attached to Safari It seems likely that the slowdown is simply due to the lack of optimisation in JSCore in debug builds of WebKit. From that point of view, it behaves as expected and is not really a bug. David, I'll let you decide what to do with this bug report.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 10 2006-07-26 00:41:52 PDT
Closing bug as RESOLVED/INVALID per Comment #9. Thanks Mark! Guess I won't be running debug versions of WebKit with Drosera anymore!
Timothy Hatcher
Comment 11 2008-05-17 09:55:55 PDT
Closing since Drosera has been replaced by the new Web Inspector debugger. Moving to the New Bugs component so the Drosera component can be closed and removed.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.