WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
99093
IndexedDB: IDL types defined in spec should be visible to scripts
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99093
Summary
IndexedDB: IDL types defined in spec should be visible to scripts
Joshua Bell
Reported
2012-10-11 13:18:21 PDT
IndexedDB: IDL types defined in spec should be visible to scripts
Attachments
Patch
(6.81 KB, patch)
2012-10-11 13:19 PDT
,
Joshua Bell
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch for landing
(7.73 KB, patch)
2012-10-11 13:40 PDT
,
Joshua Bell
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(1)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Joshua Bell
Comment 1
2012-10-11 13:19:59 PDT
Created
attachment 168266
[details]
Patch
Joshua Bell
Comment 2
2012-10-11 13:21:12 PDT
alecflett@, dgrogan@ - please take a look. With this we pass
http://w3c-test.org/webapps/IndexedDB/tests/submissions/Opera/idbtransaction.htm
David Grogan
Comment 3
2012-10-11 13:30:46 PDT
LGTM I don't know why this is necessary, but I believe you that it is. Seems harmless. removeVendorPrefixes() in shared.js has a similar check (shouldBeTrueQuiet...). You might want to update that instead of or in addition to the layout test you have here.
Adam Barth
Comment 4
2012-10-11 13:32:47 PDT
> I don't know why this is necessary, but I believe you that it is. Seems harmless.
You don't know why exposing these properties is necessary from an API point of view or why we need to declare them explicitly in the IDL from an implementation point of view?
David Grogan
Comment 5
2012-10-11 13:33:39 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> > I don't know why this is necessary, but I believe you that it is. Seems harmless. > > You don't know why exposing these properties is necessary from an API point of view or why we need to declare them explicitly in the IDL from an implementation point of view?
The first.
Adam Barth
Comment 6
2012-10-11 13:36:54 PDT
Typically its so web pages can manipulate the prototypes of these objects, for example to shim in future versions of the API.
David Grogan
Comment 7
2012-10-11 13:38:52 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Typically its so web pages can manipulate the prototypes of these objects, for example to shim in future versions of the API.
Got it, that makes sense. Josh also mentioned that this could allow for easier feature detection.
Joshua Bell
Comment 8
2012-10-11 13:40:34 PDT
Created
attachment 168268
[details]
Patch for landing
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9
2012-10-11 14:37:11 PDT
Comment on
attachment 168268
[details]
Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 168268 Committed
r131096
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/131096
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10
2012-10-11 14:37:14 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug