Bug 98591 - [EFL][DRT] Switch default backing store to single
Summary: [EFL][DRT] Switch default backing store to single
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebKit
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WebKit EFL (show other bugs)
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Hardware: Unspecified Unspecified
: P2 Normal
Assignee: Ryuan Choi
URL: http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/web...
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-10-06 02:03 PDT by Ryuan Choi
Modified: 2012-10-09 16:01 PDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Patch (2.38 KB, patch)
2012-10-07 18:41 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff
Patch (2.38 KB, patch)
2012-10-07 22:52 PDT, Ryuan Choi
no flags Details | Formatted Diff | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryuan Choi 2012-10-06 02:03:02 PDT
As discussed in webkit-efl mailing list,

I think that it is more suitable to use ewk_view_single as a default backing store of DRT.


After running pixel-tests in my local,
single has 49 image-only regressions and tiled has 54 regressions.

Patch will be added.
Comment 1 Ryuan Choi 2012-10-07 18:41:17 PDT
Created attachment 167492 [details]
Patch
Comment 2 Ryuan Choi 2012-10-07 22:52:45 PDT
Created attachment 167511 [details]
Patch
Comment 3 Eric Seidel (no email) 2012-10-08 11:41:30 PDT
Comment on attachment 167511 [details]
Patch

rs=me.
Comment 4 WebKit Review Bot 2012-10-08 12:18:31 PDT
Comment on attachment 167511 [details]
Patch

Clearing flags on attachment: 167511

Committed r130673: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/130673>
Comment 5 WebKit Review Bot 2012-10-08 12:18:34 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed.  Closing bug.
Comment 6 Balazs Kelemen 2012-10-09 14:59:53 PDT
By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship.
Comment 7 Ryuan Choi 2012-10-09 16:01:11 PDT
(In reply to comment #6)
> By TBS, do you refer some EFL specific thingy or the TBS support in WebKit? In the second case I don't think it's wise to use another backend for testing that you actually ship.

This is only Efl specific. WebKit1/Efl has used its own TBS (not in WebCore).

Tizen had used TBS of WebKit1/Efl but moved to WebKit2/Efl.
In case of other Efl applications using WebKit1/Efl such as elm_web and eve,
they have used SBS as a default backing store.

So, I believe that testing SBS is more reasonable.

Thank you.