WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 97573
[GTK] WebKitGTK+ is very hard to build and test
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97573
Summary
[GTK] WebKitGTK+ is very hard to build and test
Martin Robinson
Reported
2012-09-25 10:10:31 PDT
WebKitGTK+ is very hard to build, so this is a metabug that tracks making it easier.
Attachments
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Martin Robinson
Comment 1
2012-09-25 11:30:30 PDT
I think this bug should also track problems getting the layout tests and unit tests running and passing, so I've expanded it.
Zan Dobersek
Comment 2
2012-10-05 11:42:37 PDT
What exactly is meant under 'very hard to build'? The dependencies issues or build time or something else?
Martin Robinson
Comment 3
2012-10-05 11:46:17 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> What exactly is meant under 'very hard to build'? The dependencies issues or build time or something else?
There are a few issues that make it hard to build WebKitGTK+. One is the requirement for a patched version of make and another is that debug builds take a long time and typically consume a lot of memory. Additionally, there are many small things that can go wrong when building WebKitGTK+ for the first time. This bug is about fixing all those issues so that it's a simple and easy as possible to build the library. The dependencies issue isn't such a big deal, but perhaps we should include a special jhbuild that has the dependency delta from the previous stable version of Ubuntu.
Simon Pena
Comment 4
2013-07-05 03:28:41 PDT
This has not exactly been fixed, but Andrés Gómez has been working quite a bit on that direction. See
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKitGTK/StartHacking
and linked pages.
Martin Robinson
Comment 5
2014-04-08 19:04:32 PDT
I think this a lot easier these days with the JHBuild and our switch to CMake.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug