WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED INVALID
Bug 97172
REGRESSION(
r129007
): It broke the build on the Qt bots (Requested by Ossy on #webkit).
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97172
Summary
REGRESSION(r129007): It broke the build on the Qt bots (Requested by Ossy on ...
WebKit Review Bot
Reported
2012-09-19 22:47:20 PDT
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129007
broke the build: It broke the build on the Qt bots (Requested by Ossy on #webkit). This is an automatic bug report generated by the sheriff-bot. If this bug report was created because of a flaky test, please file a bug for the flaky test (if we don't already have one on file) and dup this bug against that bug so that we can track how often these flaky tests case pain. "Only you can prevent forest fires." -- Smokey the Bear
Attachments
ROLLOUT of r129007
(2.42 KB, patch)
2012-09-19 22:47 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 1
2012-09-19 22:47:50 PDT
Created
attachment 164844
[details]
ROLLOUT of
r129007
Any committer can land this patch automatically by marking it commit-queue+. The commit-queue will build and test the patch before landing to ensure that the rollout will be successful. This process takes approximately 15 minutes. If you would like to land the rollout faster, you can use the following command: webkit-patch land-attachment ATTACHMENT_ID where ATTACHMENT_ID is the ID of this attachment.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 2
2012-09-19 22:50:03 PDT
Comment on
attachment 164844
[details]
ROLLOUT of
r129007
Clearing flags on attachment: 164844 Committed
r129092
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129092
>
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 3
2012-09-19 22:50:07 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 4
2012-09-19 22:50:35 PDT
error: cc1plus: error: to generate dependencies you must specify either -M or -MM
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 5
2012-09-20 01:21:57 PDT
Reopen, because the bug isn't fixed.
Loïc Yhuel
Comment 6
2012-09-27 16:17:19 PDT
This patch deleted empty.cpp, instead of reverting to previous state (empty file), so now the gccdepends config test always fails.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 7
2012-11-30 04:49:00 PST
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> This patch deleted empty.cpp, instead of reverting to previous state (empty file), so now the gccdepends config test always fails.
Ooops, I added empty empty.cpp back in
r136226
. Simon, Tor Arne: Is the original bug still valid? Or can we close this as WONTFIX?
Tor Arne Vestbø
Comment 8
2012-11-30 05:19:44 PST
Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced. We should perhaps figure out how it broke the build so we can fix the original patch.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 9
2012-11-30 05:23:08 PST
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced. We should perhaps figure out how it broke the build so we can fix the original patch.
The question is very good after 2 months .... Who remembers what happened that time. Let me try to find the bot history.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 10
2012-11-30 05:30:10 PST
I checked 2-3 bots history ... but I can't find any useful information. :-/ I can't remember which bots / EWS were broken that time. Let's try to debug it on monday.
Csaba Osztrogonác
Comment 11
2012-11-30 05:48:36 PST
(In reply to
comment #8
)
> Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced.
It means that the "GNUmake gcc_MD_depends" case was always broken with all-in-one files. But the accidentally missing empty.cpp simple disabled "GNUmake gcc_MD_depends" everywhere. That's why nobody noticed it.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug