http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129007 broke the build: It broke the build on the Qt bots (Requested by Ossy on #webkit). This is an automatic bug report generated by the sheriff-bot. If this bug report was created because of a flaky test, please file a bug for the flaky test (if we don't already have one on file) and dup this bug against that bug so that we can track how often these flaky tests case pain. "Only you can prevent forest fires." -- Smokey the Bear
Created attachment 164844 [details] ROLLOUT of r129007 Any committer can land this patch automatically by marking it commit-queue+. The commit-queue will build and test the patch before landing to ensure that the rollout will be successful. This process takes approximately 15 minutes. If you would like to land the rollout faster, you can use the following command: webkit-patch land-attachment ATTACHMENT_ID where ATTACHMENT_ID is the ID of this attachment.
Comment on attachment 164844 [details] ROLLOUT of r129007 Clearing flags on attachment: 164844 Committed r129092: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/129092>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
error: cc1plus: error: to generate dependencies you must specify either -M or -MM
Reopen, because the bug isn't fixed.
This patch deleted empty.cpp, instead of reverting to previous state (empty file), so now the gccdepends config test always fails.
(In reply to comment #6) > This patch deleted empty.cpp, instead of reverting to previous state (empty file), so now the gccdepends config test always fails. Ooops, I added empty empty.cpp back in r136226. Simon, Tor Arne: Is the original bug still valid? Or can we close this as WONTFIX?
Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced. We should perhaps figure out how it broke the build so we can fix the original patch.
(In reply to comment #8) > Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced. We should perhaps figure out how it broke the build so we can fix the original patch. The question is very good after 2 months .... Who remembers what happened that time. Let me try to find the bot history.
I checked 2-3 bots history ... but I can't find any useful information. :-/ I can't remember which bots / EWS were broken that time. Let's try to debug it on monday.
(In reply to comment #8) > Barring the broken rollout, the original bug is now reintroduced. It means that the "GNUmake gcc_MD_depends" case was always broken with all-in-one files. But the accidentally missing empty.cpp simple disabled "GNUmake gcc_MD_depends" everywhere. That's why nobody noticed it.