RESOLVED FIXED 96986
[meta] Content reprojection for Shadow DOM 
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96986
Summary [meta] Content reprojection for Shadow DOM
Shinya Kawanaka
Reported 2012-09-18 00:24:47 PDT
We will make elements re-distributable in Shadow DOM. This meta bug covers all issues related to it.
Attachments
Add attachment proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Shinya Kawanaka
Comment 1 2012-09-18 00:39:53 PDT
In this series, we will make the following things available. <host> ---- SR | | |- DIV (A) |-DIV ---------------SR |- DIV (B) |-<shadow> (D) |-<content select="DIV"> (E) |-DIV (C) DIV (A) and DIV (B) are distributed to <shadow> (D) in the current spec. In the coming spec, we will make it available to distribute (A) and (B) to (E) again. (This is called reprojection or redistribution) This will improve the component-ability of elements much.
Shinya Kawanaka
Comment 2 2012-09-19 02:12:47 PDT
When implementing content reprojection, we have to update both InsertionPoint, TreeWalker, etc. at once. It will be good to have some flag?
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 3 2012-09-19 09:02:24 PDT
(In reply to comment #2) > It will be good to have some flag? If we can avoid it, we should. If we can't, we could add a flag.
Hajime Morrita
Comment 4 2012-09-19 19:05:28 PDT
Just for curious, that is the whole plan to make this happen? Apparently Bug 96988 and Bug 97151 doesn't cover everything we need. If there is some big picture for this, it would be helpful for reviewing coming patches.
Dimitri Glazkov (Google)
Comment 5 2012-09-19 19:51:08 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > Just for curious, that is the whole plan to make this happen? > Apparently Bug 96988 and Bug 97151 doesn't cover everything we need. > If there is some big picture for this, > it would be helpful for reviewing coming patches. +1 -- a plan sounds good.
Shinya Kawanaka
Comment 6 2012-09-25 21:19:07 PDT
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Just for curious, that is the whole plan to make this happen? > > Apparently Bug 96988 and Bug 97151 doesn't cover everything we need. > > If there is some big picture for this, > > it would be helpful for reviewing coming patches. > > +1 -- a plan sounds good. In my understandings, refactoring SelectorChecker and improving ComposedShadowTreeWalker will cover rendering things.
Shinya Kawanaka
Comment 7 2012-10-28 21:27:24 PDT
all sub-bugs have been resolved. It's time to close this?
Hajime Morrita
Comment 8 2012-10-29 04:17:54 PDT
(In reply to comment #7) > all sub-bugs have been resolved. It's time to close this? Good catch. Closing.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.