WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Search+
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
95334
Web Inspector: the URL of worker inspector window sometimes is invalid
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95334
Summary
Web Inspector: the URL of worker inspector window sometimes is invalid
Peter Wang
Reported
2012-08-29 05:27:06 PDT
It's caused by a defect of function "_openInspectorWindow" in "WorkerManager.js". Taking QT port as example, the "window.location.href" is "qrc://../inspector.html", so the url of popup inspector window is "qrc://../inspector.html&dedicatedWorkerId", it causes a problem. To insert a '?' can make it works, the right url is "qrc://../inspector.html?&dedicatedWorkerId".
Attachments
Patch
(1.79 KB, patch)
2012-08-29 05:44 PDT
,
Peter Wang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(1.72 KB, patch)
2012-08-29 06:23 PDT
,
Peter Wang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
The description of the problem
(89.49 KB, image/png)
2012-08-31 02:40 PDT
,
Peter Wang
no flags
Details
Patch
(1.77 KB, patch)
2012-08-31 03:22 PDT
,
Peter Wang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(2.17 KB, patch)
2012-09-03 02:16 PDT
,
Peter Wang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(3)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Peter Wang
Comment 1
2012-08-29 05:44:39 PDT
Created
attachment 161203
[details]
Patch
Yury Semikhatsky
Comment 2
2012-08-29 06:04:32 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161203
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161203&action=review
> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:166 > + if (!search)
This can be simplified: var url = window.location.href if (!search) url += "?"; url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId;
Peter Wang
Comment 3
2012-08-29 06:23:53 PDT
Created
attachment 161210
[details]
Patch
Peter Wang
Comment 4
2012-08-29 06:24:08 PDT
(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 161203
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161203&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:166 > > + if (!search) > > This can be simplified: > var url = window.location.href > if (!search) > url += "?"; > url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId;
But, seems for Chromium the "window.location.href" have a '?'(In reply to
comment #2
)
> (From update of
attachment 161203
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161203&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:166 > > + if (!search) > > This can be simplified: > var url = window.location.href > if (!search) > url += "?"; > url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId;
sorry.
Peter Wang
Comment 5
2012-08-29 06:27:07 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #2
) > > (From update of
attachment 161203
[details]
[details]) > > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161203&action=review
> > > > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:166 > > > + if (!search) > > > > This can be simplified: > > var url = window.location.href > > if (!search) > > url += "?"; > > url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > But, seems for Chromium the "window.location.href" have a '?'(In reply to
comment #2
) > > (From update of
attachment 161203
[details]
[details]) > > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161203&action=review
> > > > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:166 > > > + if (!search) > > > > This can be simplified: > > var url = window.location.href > > if (!search) > > url += "?"; > > url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > sorry.
sorry, this comment is submitted by a mistake. It should be ignored.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 6
2012-08-31 01:57:41 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161210
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161210&action=review
> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:168 > + url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId;
You don't need '&' to follow '?', right?
Peter Wang
Comment 7
2012-08-31 02:06:03 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> (From update of
attachment 161210
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161210&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:168 > > + url += "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > You don't need '&' to follow '?', right?
No, I need "&dedicatedWorkerId" to indicate the parameter, but the "url" is not always ended with '?', and it will caused a invalid URL.
Peter Wang
Comment 8
2012-08-31 02:40:56 PDT
Created
attachment 161646
[details]
The description of the problem I've upload a picture as a description of this bug. Maybe it shows the problem more clearly.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 9
2012-08-31 02:45:58 PDT
I think I understand the problem clearly. But you code produces foo.com?&dedicatedWorkerId=... for "foo.com" href. It should produce foo.com?dedicatedWorkerId=...
Peter Wang
Comment 10
2012-08-31 03:22:15 PDT
Created
attachment 161650
[details]
Patch
Peter Wang
Comment 11
2012-08-31 03:25:18 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> I think I understand the problem clearly. But you code produces > > foo.com?&dedicatedWorkerId=... > > for "foo.com" href. It should produce > > foo.com?dedicatedWorkerId=...
Yes, it seems not good. Shame.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 12
2012-08-31 05:45:07 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161650
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161650&action=review
> Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:-164 > - var url = window.location.href + "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId;
var url = window.location.href + (window.location.search ? "&" : "?") + "dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; would keep it one liner.
Andrey Adaikin
Comment 13
2012-08-31 12:29:18 PDT
(In reply to
comment #12
)
> (From update of
attachment 161650
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161650&action=review
> > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:-164 > > - var url = window.location.href + "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > var url = window.location.href + (window.location.search ? "&" : "?") + "dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > would keep it one liner.
FYI provided that window.location.hash is always empty
Pavel Feldman
Comment 14
2012-09-03 02:08:43 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161650
[details]
Patch Lets keep the code dense!
Peter Wang
Comment 15
2012-09-03 02:16:34 PDT
Created
attachment 161882
[details]
Patch
Peter Wang
Comment 16
2012-09-03 02:17:46 PDT
(In reply to
comment #13
)
> (In reply to
comment #12
) > > (From update of
attachment 161650
[details]
[details]) > > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=161650&action=review
> > > > > Source/WebCore/inspector/front-end/WorkerManager.js:-164 > > > - var url = window.location.href + "&dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > > > var url = window.location.href + (window.location.search ? "&" : "?") + "dedicatedWorkerId=" + workerId; > > > > would keep it one liner. > > FYI > provided that window.location.hash is always empty
Thx. Yes, window.location.hash is a problem.
Peter Wang
Comment 17
2012-09-03 02:27:50 PDT
(In reply to
comment #15
)
> Created an attachment (id=161882) [details] > Patch
So far (In reply to
comment #14
)
> (From update of
attachment 161650
[details]
) > Lets keep the code dense!
Ok.The newest patch can handle the situation if there is a "window.location.hash" in url.
Pavel Feldman
Comment 18
2012-09-03 06:23:48 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161882
[details]
Patch At some point we should make ParsedURL read-write so that one could patch query parameters and serialize it back.
Charles Wei
Comment 19
2012-09-03 19:04:53 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161882
[details]
Patch commit.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 20
2012-09-03 19:09:20 PDT
Comment on
attachment 161882
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 161882 Committed
r127437
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/127437
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 21
2012-09-03 19:09:24 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug