IndexedDB: Test if getting a TRANSACTION_INACTIVE_ERR is possible when setting version
Created attachment 158945 [details] Patch
Alec, could you look at this? It looks like Josh had similar suspicions, as his patch in https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=158936&action=review#line228 changes this to ASSERT(ok).
Comment on attachment 158945 [details] Patch lgtm
Ojan, could you review this 5-liner?
Comment on attachment 158945 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=158945&action=review > Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:13 > + is not hit after a while, change it to ASSERT(ok). By ASSERT(ok), do you mean ASSERT(transaction.scheduleTask(...))?
Created attachment 159207 [details] Patch for landing
Comment on attachment 158945 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=158945&action=review Thanks for the review. >> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:13 >> + is not hit after a while, change it to ASSERT(ok). > > By ASSERT(ok), do you mean ASSERT(transaction.scheduleTask(...))? Yes, changed.
Comment on attachment 159207 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 159207 Committed r125943: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125943>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.