WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
94200
REGRESSION (
r125710
): accessibility/accessibility-node-reparent.html, accessibility/accessibility-node-memory-management.html failing on GTK Linux
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94200
Summary
REGRESSION (r125710): accessibility/accessibility-node-reparent.html, accessi...
Zan Dobersek
Reported
2012-08-16 00:44:05 PDT
accessibility/accessibility-node-reparent.html and accessibility/accessibility-node-memory-management.html started failing on GTK Linux 64-bit Release after introduced in
r125710
.
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125710
http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#group=%40ToT%20-%20webkit.org&tests=accessibility%2Faccessibility-node
--- /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release/build/layout-test-results/accessibility/accessibility-node-memory-management-expected.txt +++ /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release/build/layout-test-results/accessibility/accessibility-node-memory-management-actual.txt @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ PASS expectedButtonRole != expectedDetachedRole is true PASS canvasButtonRole is expectedButtonRole -PASS detachedCanvasButtonRole is expectedDetachedRole +FAIL detachedCanvasButtonRole should be AXRole: unknown. Was AXRole: list item. PASS successfullyParsed is true TEST COMPLETE --- /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release/build/layout-test-results/accessibility/accessibility-node-reparent-expected.txt +++ /home/slave/webkitgtk/gtk-linux-64-release/build/layout-test-results/accessibility/accessibility-node-reparent-actual.txt @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ PASS expectedButtonRole != expectedDetachedRole is true PASS canvasButtonRole is expectedButtonRole -PASS detachedCanvasButtonRole is expectedDetachedRole +FAIL detachedCanvasButtonRole should be AXRole: unknown. Was AXRole: list item. PASS reparentedButtonRole is expectedButtonRole PASS successfullyParsed is true
Attachments
Crash log
(21.52 KB, application/octet-stream)
2012-08-17 00:57 PDT
,
Zan Dobersek
no flags
Details
Patch
(3.54 KB, patch)
2012-08-21 15:30 PDT
,
Dominic Mazzoni
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sergio Villar Senin
Comment 1
2012-08-16 01:25:57 PDT
Moving component to accessibility and adding a couple of guys to de Cc. Also I'd like to point out the crash in accessibility/canvas-fallback-content.html:
http://build.webkit.org/results/GTK%20Linux%2064-bit%20Debug/r125750%20(35657)/accessibility/canvas-fallback-content-crash-log.txt
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00007fdf573c2c32 in WebCore::Node::isFocusable (this=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp:927 Thread 1 (Thread 0x7fdf4c6ce900 (LWP 1856)): #0 0x00007fdf573c2c32 in WebCore::Node::isFocusable (this=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/dom/Node.cpp:927 #1 0x00007fdf57049912 in WebCore::AccessibilityNodeObject::determineAccessibilityRole (this=0x31cdc60) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/AccessibilityNodeObject.cpp:268 #2 0x00007fdf57048f4f in WebCore::AccessibilityNodeObject::init (this=0x31cdc60) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/AccessibilityNodeObject.cpp:99 #3 0x00007fdf57048fa2 in WebCore::AccessibilityNodeObject::create (node=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/AccessibilityNodeObject.cpp:105 #4 0x00007fdf57070e15 in WebCore::createFromNode (node=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/AXObjectCache.cpp:283 #5 0x00007fdf570711a3 in WebCore::AXObjectCache::getOrCreate (this=0x315b8f0, node=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/AXObjectCache.cpp:323 #6 0x00007fdf583eef94 in WebCore::AXObjectCache::handleFocusedUIElementChanged (this=0x315b8f0, oldFocusedNode=0x317cc20, newFocusedNode=0x317c400) at ../../Source/WebCore/accessibility/gtk/AXObjectCacheAtk.cpp:248 #7 0x00007fdf57332425 in WebCore::Document::setFocusedNode (this=0x313afc0, prpNewFocusedNode=...) at ../../Source/WebCore/dom/Document.cpp:3862 #8 0x00007fdf578684f1 in WebCore::FocusController::setFocusedNode (this=0x22df9e0, node=0x317c400, newFocusedFrame=...) at ../../Source/WebCore/page/FocusController.cpp:648 #9 0x00007fdf57382a2a in WebCore::Element::focus (this=0x317c400, restorePreviousSelection=true) at ../../Source/WebCore/dom/Element.cpp:1578 #10 0x00007fdf57fefc0b in WebCore::jsElementPrototypeFunctionFocus (exec=0x7fdf080b40d0) at DerivedSources/WebCore/JSElement.cpp:2023
Sergio Villar Senin
Comment 2
2012-08-16 01:26:07 PDT
***
Bug 94204
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Zan Dobersek
Comment 3
2012-08-17 00:57:53 PDT
Created
attachment 159033
[details]
Crash log The same crash also occurs in fast/canvas/fallback-content.html Also occurs on Apple Lion Debug WK2 bots:
http://test-results.appspot.com/dashboards/flakiness_dashboard.html#group=%40ToT%20-%20webkit.org&showAllRuns=true&tests=accessibility%2Fcanvas-fallback-content.html%2Cfast%2Fcanvas%2Ffallback-content.html
Attaching the complete crash log.
Dominic Mazzoni
Comment 4
2012-08-17 08:02:29 PDT
FYI, the canvas-fallback-content crash is fixed by the patch on 94156. The GTK-specific failures will need some investigation, and I've updated the test expectations for now.
Dominic Mazzoni
Comment 5
2012-08-21 15:23:21 PDT
The crash has been fixed. I debugged the test failures, and I have a patch. It was a bug in DumpRenderTree/gtk.
Dominic Mazzoni
Comment 6
2012-08-21 15:30:55 PDT
Created
attachment 159781
[details]
Patch
Martin Robinson
Comment 7
2012-08-21 15:50:47 PDT
Looks good to me, but I think that Mario should double-check this one.
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 8
2012-08-22 00:57:05 PDT
(In reply to
comment #7
)
> Looks good to me, but I think that Mario should double-check this one.
Looks good to me too. Thanks for fixing these two, Dominic!
chris fleizach
Comment 9
2012-08-22 07:59:41 PDT
Comment on
attachment 159781
[details]
Patch r=me
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10
2012-08-22 09:00:48 PDT
Comment on
attachment 159781
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 159781 Committed
r126309
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/126309
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11
2012-08-22 09:00:51 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Alejandro Piñeiro
Comment 12
2012-08-24 04:43:49 PDT
While working on other bug I run the tests, and for several of them I found several g_object_ref/g_object_unref on stderr. For example: +accessibility/aria-hidden-updates-alldescendants.html stderr g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed After investigating a little I found that this started to happen after the patch on this bug. If I revert the patch I don't get those messages. Should I reopen this bug?
Zan Dobersek
Comment 13
2012-08-24 04:55:10 PDT
(In reply to
comment #12
)
> While working on other bug I run the tests, and for several of them I found several g_object_ref/g_object_unref on stderr. For example: > > +accessibility/aria-hidden-updates-alldescendants.html stderr > > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed > > > After investigating a little I found that this started to happen after the patch on this bug. If I revert the patch I don't get those messages. > > Should I reopen this bug?
Seems as null pointers are passed into AccessibilityUIElement constructors. Perhaps using a GRefPtr would fix this in style? That is, using 'typedef GRefPtr<AtkObject> PlatformUIElement;' in AccessibilityUIElement.h.
Dominic Mazzoni
Comment 14
2012-08-24 08:02:58 PDT
My vote would be a new bug. Reverting the ref/unref is definitely wrong, it'd be a step backwards to not have that. GRefPtr might help, but I think there are probably a couple of cases where a null check might be needed. It'd be best to actually debug these.
Alejandro Piñeiro
Comment 15
2012-08-27 02:15:43 PDT
(In reply to
comment #14
)
> My vote would be a new bug.
Done:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95062
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug