WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
94085
Cancel the outstanding vibration pattern if the pattern is 0 or an empty list
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94085
Summary
Cancel the outstanding vibration pattern if the pattern is 0 or an empty list
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Reported
2012-08-15 01:43:23 PDT
We must cancel the outstanding vibration pattern (i.e stop the device from vibrating), if the pattern is 0 or an empty list.
Attachments
Patch
(1.58 KB, patch)
2012-08-15 02:11 PDT
,
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(1.75 KB, patch)
2012-08-15 04:14 PDT
,
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(1.96 KB, patch)
2012-08-20 16:12 PDT
,
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(2)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 1
2012-08-15 02:11:13 PDT
Created
attachment 158529
[details]
Patch
Kihong Kwon
Comment 2
2012-08-15 02:41:57 PDT
Looks fine to me. But, IMHO we need more detail description. It's hard to understand why you change vibrate logic like this.
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 3
2012-08-15 04:14:18 PDT
Created
attachment 158543
[details]
Patch Thanks for the informal review Kihong. Updated changelog now.
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 4
2012-08-15 06:29:18 PDT
Comment on
attachment 158543
[details]
Patch Can we please have a test for this?
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 5
2012-08-15 06:46:39 PDT
Kenneth, thanks for looking into this. Unfortunately there is no return value in the Vibration API to check status. Same issue was discussed in
bug 93957, comment 4
.
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Comment 6
2012-08-15 06:47:36 PDT
Can't you do some private hooks for testing?
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 7
2012-08-15 07:52:51 PDT
(In reply to
comment #6
)
> Can't you do some private hooks for testing?
I have no clue about this, but what I'm planning to do next is write unit tests for the API (in
bug 93890
) and make sure that vibrate/cancel callabcks are getting called correctly and the implementation is fully compliant with the spec.
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 8
2012-08-17 09:01:11 PDT
EFL WK2 port has unit tests(landed in
r125893
) for the Vibration API now to verify the implementation.
Sudarsana Nagineni (babu)
Comment 9
2012-08-20 16:12:35 PDT
Created
attachment 159554
[details]
Patch Rebased and updated changelog.
Kentaro Hara
Comment 10
2012-08-20 16:34:35 PDT
Comment on
attachment 159554
[details]
Patch The change looks reasonable. We wanted any test, but it would be OK for now based on the following comment.
> EFL WK2 port has unit tests(landed in
r125893
) for the Vibration API now to verify the implementation.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11
2012-08-20 18:50:31 PDT
Comment on
attachment 159554
[details]
Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 159554 Committed
r126116
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/126116
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 12
2012-08-20 18:50:35 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug