[Chromium] IndexedDB: API stubs to simplify WebIDBCursor API
Created attachment 154724 [details] Patch
Please wait for approval from abarth@webkit.org, dglazkov@chromium.org, fishd@chromium.org, jamesr@chromium.org or tkent@chromium.org before submitting, as this patch contains changes to the Chromium public API. See also https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/ChromiumWebKitAPI.
Note that I will NOT be landing this until alecflett@'s in-progress index changes have landed, as they touch similar code. Full landing sequence is: (1) WebKit prep: Add new API stubs http://webkit.org/b/92414 (this patch) (2) Chromium changes: dispatch to old and new API https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/10830028 (3) WebKit changes: use the new API http://webkit.org/b/92278 (4) Chromium cleanup: delete old API usage (5) WebKit changes: delete old API Wheee. Questions for reviewers: * Should I name the two IDBKey arguments? (key and primaryKey) * Instead of two new WebIDBCallback methods, onSuccess(cursor, key, primaryKey, value) - callback from openCursor(), and onSuccess(key, primaryKey, value) - callback from continue(), I could use the same method for both; passing along the cursor as a callback from continue() would be redundant but not harmful. dgrogan@, alecflett@ - please take a look
Created attachment 154759 [details] Patch
LGTM (In reply to comment #3) > * Instead of two new WebIDBCallback methods, onSuccess(cursor, key, primaryKey, value) - callback from openCursor(), and onSuccess(key, primaryKey, value) - callback from continue(), I could use the same method for both; passing along the cursor as a callback from continue() would be redundant but not harmful. I'd keep them separate but *shrug*.
+1 on separate - its hard enough to keep the various onSuccess's apart as it is :)
abarth@, fishd@ or others - r? Note the "full landing sequence" comment for context.
> * Should I name the two IDBKey arguments? (key and primaryKey) Yeah, generally if you have two arguments of the same type it's a good idea to give them names so folks can tell them apart.
FWIW, the bulk of my changes that should affect this have landed - I'm happy to have this bug sequence start to land and I'll sort through any leftover conflicts in bug 91125
Comment on attachment 154759 [details] Patch Rejecting attachment 154759 [details] from commit-queue. Failed to run "['/mnt/git/webkit-commit-queue/Tools/Scripts/webkit-patch', '--status-host=queues.webkit.org', '-..." exit_code: 1 ERROR: /mnt/git/webkit-commit-queue/Source/WTF/ChangeLog neither lists a valid reviewer nor contains the string "Unreviewed" or "Rubber stamp" (case insensitive). Full output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13410492
Created attachment 155869 [details] Patch for landing
Comment on attachment 155869 [details] Patch for landing Clearing flags on attachment: 155869 Committed r124382: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/124382>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.