The only way to report an object should be either MemoryInstrumentation::addObject or MemoryInstrumentation::addInstrumentedObject.
Created attachment 154646 [details] Patch
Created attachment 154650 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 154646 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=154646&action=review > Source/WebCore/dom/MemoryInstrumentation.h:65 > - template <typename T> void addMember(const T& t, ObjectType objectType) > + template <typename T> void addObject(const T& t, ObjectType objectType) > { > - OwningTraits<T>::addMember(this, t, objectType); > + OwningTraits<T>::addObject(this, t, objectType); > } I see that we never call addObject from places other than MemoryClassInfo. Please move it to private area.
Comment on attachment 154646 [details] Patch Attachment 154646 [details] did not pass qt-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13339771
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 154646 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=154646&action=review > > > Source/WebCore/dom/MemoryInstrumentation.h:65 > > - template <typename T> void addMember(const T& t, ObjectType objectType) > > + template <typename T> void addObject(const T& t, ObjectType objectType) > > { > > - OwningTraits<T>::addMember(this, t, objectType); > > + OwningTraits<T>::addObject(this, t, objectType); > > } > > I see that we never call addObject from places other than MemoryClassInfo. Please move it to private area. Done.
Comment on attachment 154650 [details] Patch Attachment 154650 [details] did not pass qt-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13353751
Comment on attachment 154650 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=154650&action=review Don't you need to set "Depend on Bug 92359" ? > Source/WebCore/dom/MemoryInstrumentation.cpp:32 > + Nit : in my humble opinion, header file is placed just below config.h without an empty line generally.
(In reply to comment #7) > (From update of attachment 154650 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=154650&action=review > > Don't you need to set "Depend on Bug 92359" ? > Done. > > Source/WebCore/dom/MemoryInstrumentation.cpp:32 > > + > > Nit : in my humble opinion, header file is placed just below config.h without an empty line generally. Done.
Created attachment 155238 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch lgtm
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch Attachment 155238 [details] did not pass qt-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13381719
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch Attachment 155238 [details] did not pass qt-wk2-ews (qt): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13401010
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch Attachment 155238 [details] did not pass win-ews (win): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13394264
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch Attachment 155238 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/13393296 New failing tests: platform/chromium/compositing/accelerated-drawing/svg-filters.html platform/chromium/compositing/accelerated-drawing/alpha.html
Created attachment 155249 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-01 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-01 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Created attachment 155262 [details] Patch for landing Fixed Qt and Win build files.
Comment on attachment 155238 [details] Patch Cleared Vsevolod Vlasov's review+ from obsolete attachment 155238 [details] so that this bug does not appear in http://webkit.org/pending-commit.
Committed r124017: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/124017>