WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
Bug 91469
[Forms] Test expectations of datetime/datetime-local/time should not contain milliseconds when they aren't expected
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91469
Summary
[Forms] Test expectations of datetime/datetime-local/time should not contain ...
yosin
Reported
2012-07-16 22:10:18 PDT
Following tests have wrong test expectations: * fsat/from/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html * fsat/from/datetimelocal/datetimelocal-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html * fsat/from/time/time-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer.html For very big step value like: shouldBe('stepUp("2012-02-12T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null)', '"276760-09-13T00:00:00.000Z"'); In this case, an expectation should not have milliseconds, e.g. "276760-09-13T00:00:00". Before
r119948
(introducing Decimal arithmetic), BasseDateAndTimeInputType::serialize checked whether resulted string containing milliseconds or not by using fmod(step, msecPerSecond), where msecPerSecond is 1000. This expression works fine when step isn't big number, and fmod(3.40282346e+38, 1000) returns 616 on my x86 linux box. Since
r119948
, BaseDateAndTimeInput::serialize uses same expression but it is done by decimal arithmetic, e.g. step.remainder(msecPerSecond).isZero(), and this expression returns false for big number.
Attachments
Patch 1
(8.66 KB, patch)
2012-07-16 22:42 PDT
,
yosin
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
yosin
Comment 1
2012-07-16 22:42:35 PDT
Created
attachment 152697
[details]
Patch 1
yosin
Comment 2
2012-07-16 22:43:27 PDT
Comment on
attachment 152697
[details]
Patch 1 Could you review this patch? Thanks in advance.
Kent Tamura
Comment 3
2012-07-16 23:54:57 PDT
Comment on
attachment 152697
[details]
Patch 1 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=152697&action=review
> LayoutTests/fast/forms/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer-expected.txt:18 > +PASS stepUp("2010-02-10T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null) is "275760-09-13T00:00:00Z"
Why don't the result 275760-09-13T00:00Z ?
yosin
Comment 4
2012-07-17 00:15:45 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 152697
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=152697&action=review
> > > LayoutTests/fast/forms/datetime/datetime-stepup-stepdown-from-renderer-expected.txt:18 > > +PASS stepUp("2010-02-10T20:13Z", "3.40282346e+38", null) is "275760-09-13T00:00:00Z" > > Why don't the result 275760-09-13T00:00Z ?
In BaseDateAndTimeInputType::serializeWithComponents which called by BaseDateAndTimeInputType::serialize checks step value against millisecond per minute and second per millisecond as below: ... if (step.remainder(msecPerMinute).isZero()) return date.toString(DateComponents::None); if (step.remainder(msecPerSecond).isZero()) return date.toString(DateComponents::Second); return date.toString(DateComponents::Millisecond); In this test case, step value mod(3.40282346e+38, msecPerSecond) != 0 and mod(3.40282346e+38, 1000) == 0. So, we call DateComponent::toString with DateComents::Second argument. This is reason that we have "00:00:00" (including second) instead of "00:00" (no second), even if second is zero.
Kent Tamura
Comment 5
2012-07-17 00:20:05 PDT
Comment on
attachment 152697
[details]
Patch 1 ok
yosin
Comment 6
2012-07-17 00:23:26 PDT
Comment on
attachment 152697
[details]
Patch 1 Clearing flags on attachment: 152697 Committed
r122815
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/122815
>
yosin
Comment 7
2012-07-17 00:23:32 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug