WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of
bug 9166
9145
Setting frame.src is not registered in history
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9145
Summary
Setting frame.src is not registered in history
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Reported
2006-05-28 07:10:03 PDT
Setting frame.src to load a page in a frame does not cause that URL to be recorded in the history. When a link to the previously loaded page appears later, that link is rendered as unvisited rather than visited. In Firefox 1.5.0.3 on Mac OS X, a page loaded via frame.src is recorded in history. In MSIE 6 on WinXP SP2, a page loaded via frame.src is NOT recorded in history. This behavior occurs in Safari 2.0.3 (417.9.3) on Mac OS X 10.4.6 (8I127) as well as locally-built WebKit
r14551
.
Attachments
Test v1
(3.13 KB, patch)
2006-05-28 07:17 PDT
,
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 1
2006-05-28 07:17:17 PDT
Created
attachment 8576
[details]
Test v1 Test demonstrating the problem with setting frame.src. It may be possible to simplify this test. Note that there is commented-out code in the frame.src-history.js file that will make the test run faster. It should be used in place of the slower code if this test is checked in.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 2
2007-05-23 20:43:52 PDT
NOTE: I filed this bug because I noticed a difference in behavior between Safari/WebKit, Firefox and MSIE 6. I do not know what the correct behavior is.
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 3
2007-07-17 07:48:11 PDT
May be fixed by:
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/changeset/24353
David Kilzer (:ddkilzer)
Comment 4
2007-07-22 20:55:36 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> May be fixed by:
http://trac.webkit.org/projects/webkit/changeset/24353
Not fixed by this change.
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 5
2007-09-30 11:19:40 PDT
I believe this is a dup of 9166, no? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
9166
***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug