RESOLVED FIXED Bug 90697
Web Inspector: CodeGeneratorInspector.py should not generate statements with no effect
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90697
Summary Web Inspector: CodeGeneratorInspector.py should not generate statements with ...
Vivek Galatage
Reported 2012-07-06 10:30:37 PDT
While generating InspectorBackendDispatcher.cpp, CodeGeneratorInspector.py generates lot of statements in the code which has no effect as - if (!error.length()) { } This should be avoided.
Attachments
Patch (3.91 KB, patch)
2012-07-06 10:33 PDT, Vivek Galatage
no flags
Patch (1.94 KB, patch)
2012-07-07 21:49 PDT, Vivek Galatage
no flags
Patch (1.94 KB, patch)
2012-07-07 22:47 PDT, Vivek Galatage
no flags
Vivek Galatage
Comment 1 2012-07-06 10:31:31 PDT
Patch to follow.
Vivek Galatage
Comment 2 2012-07-06 10:33:50 PDT
Vsevolod Vlasov
Comment 3 2012-07-06 10:35:37 PDT
+prybin@chromium.org Peter might want to have a look at this.
Peter Rybin
Comment 4 2012-07-06 11:38:09 PDT
Unfortunately right now I have a temperature, cannot look carefully. However I don't really see a reason for fixing this bug. To me it complicates generator (already too complex) without a clear benefit. I think the compiler should optimize off this statement by itself.
Vivek Galatage
Comment 5 2012-07-06 12:06:36 PDT
(In reply to comment #4) > Unfortunately right now I have a temperature, cannot look carefully. > > However I don't really see a reason for fixing this bug. To me it complicates generator (already too complex) without a clear benefit. I think the compiler should optimize off this statement by itself. I agree that compiler might nuke this off while optimizing. But while reading through the code, it doesn't convey any meaning. This in fact might create some confusion whether this piece of code has some incomplete implementation. I also agree that in this process, the Generator might become complex. But this complexity will add to more clear readability of the generated code. Your thoughts?
Vsevolod Vlasov
Comment 6 2012-07-06 12:14:33 PDT
Comment on attachment 151099 [details] Patch This indeed looks too complex for such a small value added. r- per Peter's comments. Unless it is possible to make a one or two lines fix I don't think this is reasonable.
Vivek Galatage
Comment 7 2012-07-07 21:49:05 PDT
Peter Rybin
Comment 8 2012-07-07 22:22:01 PDT
(id=151156) LGTM What's strange is that Changelog says about 2 checks, when there is only one.
Vivek Galatage
Comment 9 2012-07-07 22:42:56 PDT
(In reply to comment #8) > (id=151156) > LGTM > What's strange is that Changelog says about 2 checks, when there is only one. :) I will correct the Changelog and re-upload the patch. Thank you for the review.
Vivek Galatage
Comment 10 2012-07-07 22:47:36 PDT
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11 2012-07-08 02:04:21 PDT
Comment on attachment 151157 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 151157 Committed r122059: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/122059>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 12 2012-07-08 02:04:27 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.