WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
89266
[Texmap] TextureMapperPaintOptions should keep current surface.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89266
Summary
[Texmap] TextureMapperPaintOptions should keep current surface.
Dongseong Hwang
Reported
2012-06-15 19:16:51 PDT
Before this patch, if a replica layer has a descendant replica child, the child layer does not render the result in the parent layer's surface because TextureMapperPaintOptions does not keep current surface.
Attachments
patch v.1
(18.50 KB, patch)
2012-06-15 20:20 PDT
,
Dongseong Hwang
noam
: review-
webkit.review.bot
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-04
(789.27 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-16 15:07 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
patch v.2
(20.18 KB, patch)
2012-06-16 19:58 PDT
,
Dongseong Hwang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch v.3
(18.99 KB, patch)
2012-06-16 20:00 PDT
,
Dongseong Hwang
noam
: review-
webkit.review.bot
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-01
(727.84 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-16 20:27 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
patch v.4
(304.49 KB, patch)
2012-06-22 04:58 PDT
,
Dongseong Hwang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
patch v.5
(271.67 KB, patch)
2012-06-22 19:42 PDT
,
Dongseong Hwang
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Show Obsolete
(4)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 1
2012-06-15 20:20:02 PDT
Created
attachment 147942
[details]
patch v.1
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 2
2012-06-15 20:24:54 PDT
I need some advice. I'm afraid about 2 points after amending a Layout test in order to cover this bug. 1. This amendment effects all ports's test result, especially png files. I need how I handle it. 2. This layout test is in Qt's Skipped files for some reason, so this amendment actually does not cover Qt's Texmap now. Is it ok? I am looking forward to your kind response.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 3
2012-06-16 15:07:00 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147942
[details]
patch v.1
Attachment 147942
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12969341
New failing tests: compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4
2012-06-16 15:07:27 PDT
Created
attachment 147989
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-04 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-04 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
Noam Rosenthal
Comment 5
2012-06-16 15:36:01 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147942
[details]
patch v.1 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147942&action=review
> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:8 > + Before this patch, if a replica layer has a descendant replica child, the child > + layer does not render the result in the parent layer's surface because > + TextureMapperPaintOptions does not keep current surface.
Please describe in the changelog the change to the test.
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:8 > + Before this patch, if a replica layer has a descendant replica child, the child > + layer does not render the result in the parent layer's surface because > + TextureMapperPaintOptions does not keep current surface.
Please describe what the patch actually adds/fixes.
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 6
2012-06-16 19:58:52 PDT
Created
attachment 148001
[details]
patch v.2
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 7
2012-06-16 20:00:53 PDT
Created
attachment 148002
[details]
patch v.3
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 8
2012-06-16 20:04:42 PDT
I made mistake to push patch v.2. The test result of patch v.2. is without this patch, so you can see how test (compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection.html) result is different between patch v.2 and patch v.3
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9
2012-06-16 20:27:51 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148002
[details]
patch v.3
Attachment 148002
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12964889
New failing tests: compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10
2012-06-16 20:27:55 PDT
Created
attachment 148005
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-01 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-01 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 11
2012-06-16 20:39:50 PDT
(In reply to
comment #9
)
> (From update of
attachment 148002
[details]
) >
Attachment 148002
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): > Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12964889
> > New failing tests: > compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection.html
I expected this failure. I wonder if I want to progress, I MUST make new test results for all ports? I'm some confused. Help me. :)
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 12
2012-06-18 04:13:28 PDT
Committed
r120588
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120588
>
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 13
2012-06-18 04:16:06 PDT
(In reply to
comment #12
)
> Committed
r120588
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120588
>
Oops. Sorry, I messed up with webkit-patch and indicated this bug number instead of the righ tone 8226. Now reopening...
Mario Sanchez Prada
Comment 14
2012-06-18 04:19:49 PDT
(In reply to
comment #13
)
> (In reply to
comment #12
) > > Committed
r120588
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/120588
> > > Oops. Sorry, I messed up with webkit-patch and indicated this bug number instead of the righ tone 8226.
I meant "...of the right one:
bug 89226
". Sorry again. It's Monday, forgive me :)
Noam Rosenthal
Comment 15
2012-06-18 04:21:58 PDT
(In reply to
comment #11
)
> (In reply to
comment #9
) > > (From update of
attachment 148002
[details]
[details]) > >
Attachment 148002
[details]
[details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): > > Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12964889
> > > > New failing tests: > > compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection.html > > I expected this failure. > I wonder if I want to progress, I MUST make new test results for all ports? > I'm some confused. Help me. :)
You should update TestExpectations to reflect the result. Ask for help on #webkit if you're doing this for the first time :)
Noam Rosenthal
Comment 16
2012-06-18 04:23:46 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148002
[details]
patch v.3 View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=148002&action=review
Patch is good. Need to update results for chromium (and other ports if needed) when submitting.
> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:10 > +
Describe that you added a test that reproduces the issue.
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 17
2012-06-22 04:58:48 PDT
Created
attachment 148999
[details]
patch v.4 I found the solution in
http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/CreatingLayoutTests
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 18
2012-06-22 05:09:34 PDT
Attachment 148999
[details]
did not pass style-queue: Failed to run "['Tools/Scripts/check-webkit-style', '--diff-files', u'LayoutTests/ChangeLog', u'LayoutTests/comp..." exit_code: 1 LayoutTests/platform/mac/compositing/reflections/animation-inside-reflection-expected.png:0: Image lacks a checksum. Generate pngs using run-webkit-tests to ensure they have a checksum. [image/png] [5] Total errors found: 1 in 6 files If any of these errors are false positives, please file a bug against check-webkit-style.
Dongseong Hwang
Comment 19
2012-06-22 19:42:32 PDT
Created
attachment 149158
[details]
patch v.5
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 20
2012-06-25 14:18:42 PDT
Comment on
attachment 149158
[details]
patch v.5 Clearing flags on attachment: 149158 Committed
r121179
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/121179
>
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 21
2012-06-25 14:19:02 PDT
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug