WebKit Bugzilla
New
Browse
Log In
×
Sign in with GitHub
or
Remember my login
Create Account
·
Forgot Password
Forgotten password account recovery
RESOLVED FIXED
89238
Accumulate sub-pixel offsets through layers and transforms
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89238
Summary
Accumulate sub-pixel offsets through layers and transforms
Levi Weintraub
Reported
2012-06-15 12:06:56 PDT
To maintain consistent pixel snapping, we should be passing the sub-pixel offsets through RenderLayer to the paint code. We also generate transforms from elements to absolute space for repainting that should use pixel snapped offsets instead of converting LayoutUnits to floats.
Attachments
Patch
(326.86 KB, patch)
2012-06-15 13:44 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(323.58 KB, patch)
2012-06-15 13:46 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(322.52 KB, patch)
2012-06-15 15:55 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-03
(931.31 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-15 17:29 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-01
(847.70 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-15 18:28 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch
(309.69 KB, patch)
2012-06-18 11:32 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
webkit.review.bot
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-03
(1.26 MB, application/zip)
2012-06-18 15:12 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-04
(903.59 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-18 16:16 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch.
(308.36 KB, patch)
2012-07-31 12:01 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(309.30 KB, patch)
2012-07-31 13:18 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(309.30 KB, patch)
2012-07-31 13:59 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-04
(972.66 KB, application/zip)
2012-07-31 15:00 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch
(513.79 KB, patch)
2012-08-01 15:57 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-03
(876.93 KB, application/zip)
2012-08-01 17:01 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch
(53.53 KB, patch)
2012-08-09 19:11 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-04
(748.12 KB, application/zip)
2012-08-09 20:10 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch
(497.19 KB, patch)
2012-08-10 09:30 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Patch
(250.68 KB, patch)
2012-08-13 10:43 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
no flags
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-06
(697.98 KB, application/zip)
2012-08-13 17:42 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Patch for landing
(243.52 KB, patch)
2012-08-15 17:48 PDT
,
Levi Weintraub
webkit.review.bot
: commit-queue-
Details
Formatted Diff
Diff
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-08
(760.78 KB, application/zip)
2012-08-15 18:51 PDT
,
WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Details
Show Obsolete
(11)
View All
Add attachment
proposed patch, testcase, etc.
Levi Weintraub
Comment 1
2012-06-15 13:44:40 PDT
Created
attachment 147889
[details]
Patch
Levi Weintraub
Comment 2
2012-06-15 13:46:15 PDT
Created
attachment 147890
[details]
Patch
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 3
2012-06-15 14:17:12 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147890
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147890&action=review
r- for boolean params. When do you NOT want to pixel snap when mapping coords?
> Source/WebCore/css/CSSComputedStyleDeclaration.cpp:699 > + IntRect box = IntRect(sizingBox(renderer, true));
Gah, ugly boolean params!
Simon Fraser (smfr)
Comment 4
2012-06-15 14:19:53 PDT
(In reply to
comment #3
)
> (From update of
attachment 147890
[details]
) > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147890&action=review
> > r- for boolean params. When do you NOT want to pixel snap when mapping coords?
er, when do you WANT to pixel snap?
Levi Weintraub
Comment 5
2012-06-15 15:02:09 PDT
(In reply to
comment #4
)
> (In reply to
comment #3
) > > (From update of
attachment 147890
[details]
[details]) > > View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147890&action=review
> > > > r- for boolean params. When do you NOT want to pixel snap when mapping coords? > > er, when do you WANT to pixel snap?
We want to avoid pixel snapping for localToAbsolute to ensure that webkitConvertPoint works properly, but we want to pixel snap when translating a transform by a renderer's sub-pixel position. Otherwise, doing something as seemingly-innocuous as a rotateZ(0) can cause us to generate sub-pixel translations that'll misalign our painting. I'll get rid of the boolean parameters. Thanks for the review!
Levi Weintraub
Comment 6
2012-06-15 15:55:41 PDT
Created
attachment 147917
[details]
Patch
Build Bot
Comment 7
2012-06-15 16:43:09 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147917
[details]
Patch
Attachment 147917
[details]
did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12955913
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 8
2012-06-15 17:29:37 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147917
[details]
Patch
Attachment 147917
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12960743
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 9
2012-06-15 17:29:42 PDT
Created
attachment 147924
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-03 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-03 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 10
2012-06-15 18:28:20 PDT
Comment on
attachment 147917
[details]
Patch
Attachment 147917
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12968215
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11
2012-06-15 18:28:25 PDT
Created
attachment 147932
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-01 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-01 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
Levi Weintraub
Comment 12
2012-06-17 15:46:59 PDT
(In reply to
comment #10
)
> (From update of
attachment 147917
[details]
) >
Attachment 147917
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): > Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12968215
> > New failing tests: > fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html > fast/repaint/transform-translate.html > transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml > fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html > fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html > fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html > fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html > svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml > compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html > fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html
FYI: All these test results are expected, and the repaint tests were actually off by a pixel previously, and are now correct.
Levi Weintraub
Comment 13
2012-06-18 11:32:07 PDT
Created
attachment 148136
[details]
Patch
Levi Weintraub
Comment 14
2012-06-18 11:32:40 PDT
(In reply to
comment #13
)
> Created an attachment (id=148136) [details] > Patch
Fixing the Mac build error.
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 15
2012-06-18 15:12:07 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148136
[details]
Patch
Attachment 148136
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12970794
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 16
2012-06-18 15:12:15 PDT
Created
attachment 148182
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-03 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-03 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 17
2012-06-18 16:16:31 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148136
[details]
Patch
Attachment 148136
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/12979296
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html svg/css/getComputedStyle-basic.xhtml fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 18
2012-06-18 16:16:52 PDT
Created
attachment 148199
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-04 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-04 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
Levi Weintraub
Comment 19
2012-06-22 15:36:27 PDT
Pinging reviewers.
Levi Weintraub
Comment 20
2012-07-24 13:01:47 PDT
(In reply to
comment #19
)
> Pinging reviewers.
Been awhile, trying again.
Nikolas Zimmermann
Comment 21
2012-07-26 01:19:44 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148136
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=148136&action=review
A first round of review. Obviously Simon should have a look at this as well!
> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:20 > + (WebCore::sizingBox): Adding a bool for pixel snapping.
Aha, your code doesn't do that, it adds a new function duplicating sizingBox() functionality, but pixel-snaps. See below for a possible suggestion to avoid that.
> Source/WebCore/css/CSSComputedStyleDeclaration.cpp:707 > - LayoutRect box = sizingBox(renderer); > + IntRect box = pixelSnappedSizingBox(renderer);
Hm, can't you just use pixelSnappedIntRect(sizingBox(renderer)) here? From my understanding this should be equivalent, but avoids duplicating the logic of sizingBox() just to pixel-snap the values.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderInline.h:138 > - virtual void mapLocalToContainer(RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, bool fixed, bool useTransforms, TransformState&, ApplyContainerFlipOrNot = ApplyContainerFlip, bool* wasFixed = 0) const; > + virtual void mapLocalToContainer(RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, bool fixed, bool useTransforms, TransformState&, TransformingSubPixelOffsetBehavior adjustSubPixelOffsets = SnapOffsetsForTransforms, ApplyContainerFlipOrNot = ApplyContainerFlip, bool* wasFixed = 0) const OVERRIDE;
All these bools should go away IMHO. And I'd rather do this now before bloating mapLocalToContainer any further with new extra arguments. (Though not your fault, but we should clean this up rather today than tomorrow :-) enum MapLocalToContainerMode { IsFixed = 1 << 0, UseTransforms = 1 << 1, ApplyContainerFlip = 1 << 2, SnapOffsetForTransforms 1 << 3; } typedef unsigned MapLocalToContainerFlags; virtual void mapLocalToContainer(RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, TransformState&, MapLocalToContainerFlags = SnapOffsetForTransforms | ApplyContainerFlip, bool* wasFixed = 0) const OVERRIDE; I didn't investigate in-detail if that would make some call-sites worse to read, but it should improve readability in general.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp:549 > - box->style()->applyTransform(*m_transform, box->borderBoxRect().size(), RenderStyle::IncludeTransformOrigin); > + box->style()->applyTransform(*m_transform, box->pixelSnappedBorderBoxRect().size(), RenderStyle::IncludeTransformOrigin);
I'd like to fully understand the effects of this change, please correct me if I got anything wrong: This change is relevant for computing the transform-origin induced translation (+ the argument is also passed to the TransformOperations::apply function). You're now using pixel-snapped values here. This is correct as you're aligning the layer at pixel boundaries, but respect any fractional translation while computing the layer transform (in RenderLayer::paint). So for borderBoxRect.size = 100.5 x 100.5, and a transform-origin of 50% 50%, this now results in a m_transform containing: translate(50, 50) * specifiedTransforms * translate(-50, -50). In RenderLayer::paint, you're computing the layer transform passed to the GraphicsContext via: m_transform * translate(100, 100), and store subPixelAccumulation="0.5, 0.5". Then In RenderLayer::paintLayerContents, you're adding the subPixelAccumulation to the paintOffset, so you're effectively aligning the layer on pixel boundaries, but compensate fractional sizes by translating the context before painting. Am I reading your code correctly?
Levi Weintraub
Comment 22
2012-07-26 11:21:19 PDT
Comment on
attachment 148136
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=148136&action=review
>> Source/WebCore/ChangeLog:20 >> + (WebCore::sizingBox): Adding a bool for pixel snapping. > > Aha, your code doesn't do that, it adds a new function duplicating sizingBox() functionality, but pixel-snaps. See below for a possible suggestion to avoid that.
You caught me!
>> Source/WebCore/css/CSSComputedStyleDeclaration.cpp:707 >> + IntRect box = pixelSnappedSizingBox(renderer); > > Hm, can't you just use pixelSnappedIntRect(sizingBox(renderer)) here? > From my understanding this should be equivalent, but avoids duplicating the logic of sizingBox() just to pixel-snap the values.
The issue is that sizingBox can return RenderBox::borderBoxRect, which while maintaining the sub-pixel precision of the width and height, zeros out the location, resulting in incorrect pixel snapping.
>> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderInline.h:138 >> + virtual void mapLocalToContainer(RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, bool fixed, bool useTransforms, TransformState&, TransformingSubPixelOffsetBehavior adjustSubPixelOffsets = SnapOffsetsForTransforms, ApplyContainerFlipOrNot = ApplyContainerFlip, bool* wasFixed = 0) const OVERRIDE; > > All these bools should go away IMHO. And I'd rather do this now before bloating mapLocalToContainer any further with new extra arguments. > (Though not your fault, but we should clean this up rather today than tomorrow :-) > > enum MapLocalToContainerMode { > IsFixed = 1 << 0, > UseTransforms = 1 << 1, > ApplyContainerFlip = 1 << 2, > SnapOffsetForTransforms 1 << 3; > } > typedef unsigned MapLocalToContainerFlags; > virtual void mapLocalToContainer(RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, TransformState&, MapLocalToContainerFlags = SnapOffsetForTransforms | ApplyContainerFlip, bool* wasFixed = 0) const OVERRIDE; > > I didn't investigate in-detail if that would make some call-sites worse to read, but it should improve readability in general.
I'm happy to give this a try. The bools are bad and getting worse.
>> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayer.cpp:549 >> + box->style()->applyTransform(*m_transform, box->pixelSnappedBorderBoxRect().size(), RenderStyle::IncludeTransformOrigin); > > I'd like to fully understand the effects of this change, please correct me if I got anything wrong: > > This change is relevant for computing the transform-origin induced translation (+ the argument is also passed to the TransformOperations::apply function). > You're now using pixel-snapped values here. This is correct as you're aligning the layer at pixel boundaries, but respect any fractional translation while computing the layer transform (in RenderLayer::paint). > > So for borderBoxRect.size = 100.5 x 100.5, and a transform-origin of 50% 50%, this now results in a m_transform containing: translate(50, 50) * specifiedTransforms * translate(-50, -50). > In RenderLayer::paint, you're computing the layer transform passed to the GraphicsContext via: m_transform * translate(100, 100), and store subPixelAccumulation="0.5, 0.5". > Then In RenderLayer::paintLayerContents, you're adding the subPixelAccumulation to the paintOffset, so you're effectively aligning the layer on pixel boundaries, but compensate fractional sizes by translating the context before painting. > > Am I reading your code correctly?
Currently, we carry a sub-pixel value down through paint offsets that influences the way things are pixel snapped. This is broken with Layers. We avoid translating the transform by sub-pixel values (this would be wrong for a relatively positioned object that just happens to be an a sub-pixel offset, for example), but the current code also drops the sub-pixel remainder on the floor, which causes elements in a layer to round differently than otherwise identical elements that aren't. As for your example, you're making the mistake of considering a fractional size without a location, which you can't quite get away with with sub-pixel layout enabled.
Levi Weintraub
Comment 23
2012-07-31 12:01:44 PDT
Created
attachment 155600
[details]
Patch. Patch.
Levi Weintraub
Comment 24
2012-07-31 13:18:54 PDT
Created
attachment 155618
[details]
Patch
Build Bot
Comment 25
2012-07-31 13:46:41 PDT
Comment on
attachment 155618
[details]
Patch
Attachment 155618
[details]
did not pass win-ews (win): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13394811
Levi Weintraub
Comment 26
2012-07-31 13:59:21 PDT
Created
attachment 155629
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 27
2012-07-31 15:00:20 PDT
Comment on
attachment 155629
[details]
Patch
Attachment 155629
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13401543
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html fast/sub-pixel/layout-boxes-with-zoom.html media/audio-repaint.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html media/video-zoom-controls.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/multicol/vertical-lr/break-properties.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html fast/multicol/vertical-rl/break-properties.html fast/repaint/repaint-across-writing-mode-boundary.html fast/block/float/shrink-to-avoid-float-complexity.html fast/sub-pixel/sub-pixel-accumulates-to-layers.html fast/multicol/break-properties.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 28
2012-07-31 15:00:25 PDT
Created
attachment 155641
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-04 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-04 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Levi Weintraub
Comment 29
2012-08-01 15:57:17 PDT
Created
attachment 155909
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 30
2012-08-01 17:01:04 PDT
Comment on
attachment 155909
[details]
Patch
Attachment 155909
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13421237
New failing tests: fast/transforms/rotated-transform-affects-scrolling-2.html fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html media/audio-repaint.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/forms/validation-message-appearance.html fast/sub-pixel/sub-pixel-accumulates-to-layers.html fast/overflow/overflow-update-transform.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 31
2012-08-01 17:01:10 PDT
Created
attachment 155925
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-03 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-03 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Levi Weintraub
Comment 32
2012-08-09 19:11:35 PDT
Created
attachment 157611
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 33
2012-08-09 20:10:24 PDT
Comment on
attachment 157611
[details]
Patch
Attachment 157611
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13473189
New failing tests: fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html media/audio-repaint.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 34
2012-08-09 20:10:30 PDT
Created
attachment 157620
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-04 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-04 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Build Bot
Comment 35
2012-08-09 20:46:45 PDT
Comment on
attachment 157611
[details]
Patch
Attachment 157611
[details]
did not pass mac-ews (mac): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13471387
Levi Weintraub
Comment 36
2012-08-10 09:30:26 PDT
Created
attachment 157746
[details]
Patch
Levi Weintraub
Comment 37
2012-08-13 10:43:16 PDT
Created
attachment 158038
[details]
Patch
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 38
2012-08-13 17:42:43 PDT
Comment on
attachment 158038
[details]
Patch
Attachment 158038
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13493356
New failing tests: fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html media/audio-repaint.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/sub-pixel/sub-pixel-accumulates-to-layers.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 39
2012-08-13 17:42:50 PDT
Created
attachment 158165
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-06 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-06 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Levi Weintraub
Comment 40
2012-08-14 10:21:47 PDT
Smfr, any chance you can take a look at this?
Eric Seidel (no email)
Comment 41
2012-08-15 13:40:52 PDT
Comment on
attachment 158038
[details]
Patch View in context:
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=158038&action=review
This change looks fine.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderLayer.h:719 > + void paintLayerContents(RenderLayer* rootLayer, GraphicsContext*, const LayoutRect& paintDirtyRect, const LayoutSize& subPixelAccumulation,
You mentioned you wanted to ASSERT these were never over 1,1.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderObject.h:692 > + FloatQuad localToContainerQuad(const FloatQuad&, RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, bool snapOffsetForTransforms = true, bool fixed = false, bool* wasFixed = 0) const; > + FloatPoint localToContainerPoint(const FloatPoint&, RenderBoxModelObject* repaintContainer, bool snapOffsetForTransforms = true, bool fixed = false, bool* wasFixed = 0) const;
Not another bool!
Levi Weintraub
Comment 42
2012-08-15 17:48:40 PDT
Created
attachment 158674
[details]
Patch for landing
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 43
2012-08-15 18:51:36 PDT
Comment on
attachment 158674
[details]
Patch for landing
Attachment 158674
[details]
did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output:
http://queues.webkit.org/results/13504793
New failing tests: fast/repaint/transform-translate.html transforms/svg-vs-css.xhtml fast/repaint/transform-absolute-child.html media/audio-repaint.html fast/transforms/transformed-document-element.html fast/repaint/transform-repaint-descendants.html fast/repaint/scroll-fixed-layer-with-transformed-parent-layer.html svg/transforms/svg-css-transforms.xhtml compositing/shadows/shadow-drawing.html fast/sub-pixel/sub-pixel-accumulates-to-layers.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 44
2012-08-15 18:51:42 PDT
Created
attachment 158687
[details]
Archive of layout-test-results from gce-cr-linux-08 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: gce-cr-linux-08 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.39-gcg-201203291735-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.04-lucid
Levi Weintraub
Comment 45
2012-08-16 11:00:42 PDT
Committed
r125794
: <
http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/125794
>
Levi Weintraub
Comment 46
2012-08-20 22:48:48 PDT
***
Bug 91233
has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note
You need to
log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Top of Page
Format For Printing
XML
Clone This Bug