RESOLVED FIXED89145
[chromium] GraphicsLayerChromium should use WebContentLayer directly
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89145
Summary [chromium] GraphicsLayerChromium should use WebContentLayer directly
James Robinson
Reported 2012-06-14 18:08:44 PDT
[chromium] GraphicsLayerChromium should use WebContentLayer directly
Attachments
Patch (16.26 KB, patch)
2012-06-14 18:11 PDT, James Robinson
enne: review+
James Robinson
Comment 1 2012-06-14 18:11:18 PDT
James Robinson
Comment 2 2012-06-14 18:11:46 PDT
I'll have to land a chromium-side patch to ui/compositor/layer.cc to avoid compile breaking chromium - that's what the WEBCONTENTLAYERCLIENT_HAS_OPAQUE #define is for.
Antoine Labour
Comment 3 2012-06-14 18:13:56 PDT
Comment on attachment 147695 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147695&action=review > Source/Platform/chromium/public/WebContentLayerClient.h:42 > + // optimizations. To be clear, that's only used if !WebLayer.opaque(), right?
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 4 2012-06-14 18:15:01 PDT
Please wait for approval from abarth@webkit.org, dglazkov@chromium.org, fishd@chromium.org, jamesr@chromium.org or tkent@chromium.org before submitting, as this patch contains changes to the Chromium public API. See also https://trac.webkit.org/wiki/ChromiumWebKitAPI.
James Robinson
Comment 5 2012-06-14 18:15:33 PDT
(In reply to comment #3) > (From update of attachment 147695 [details]) > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147695&action=review > > > Source/Platform/chromium/public/WebContentLayerClient.h:42 > > + // optimizations. > > To be clear, that's only used if !WebLayer.opaque(), right? It's ignored, right. We don't set it on opaque layers to avoid paying the overhead.
Adrienne Walker
Comment 6 2012-06-15 09:04:07 PDT
Comment on attachment 147695 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147695&action=review R=me. > Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCOcclusionTrackerTest.cpp:138 > + layer->setIsDrawable(false); Isn't that the default value?
James Robinson
Comment 7 2012-06-15 14:26:59 PDT
Comment on attachment 147695 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=147695&action=review >> Source/WebKit/chromium/tests/CCOcclusionTrackerTest.cpp:138 >> + layer->setIsDrawable(false); > > Isn't that the default value? Ooh, good point. This was a bad intermediate state from when I was playing with the default value - will revert before landing.
James Robinson
Comment 8 2012-06-18 16:41:32 PDT
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.