RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 257080 87527
Increase the set of script @type values that we treat as JavaScript
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87527
Summary Increase the set of script @type values that we treat as JavaScript
Attachments
Patch (8.94 KB, patch)
2012-06-11 17:52 PDT, Pablo Flouret
darin: review+
webkit.review.bot: commit-queue-
Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-02 (531.36 KB, application/zip)
2012-06-12 00:02 PDT, WebKit Review Bot
no flags
Patch for landing (20.88 KB, patch)
2013-01-24 15:33 PST, Pablo Flouret
no flags
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 1 2012-05-25 18:26:21 PDT
Do you intend to include "text/javascript;e4x=1", just to pick what seems like the most questionable item?
Ojan Vafai
Comment 2 2012-05-25 19:05:35 PDT
(In reply to comment #1) > Do you intend to include "text/javascript;e4x=1", just to pick what seems like the most questionable item? I'm not actually intending on working on this, but I think we should either implement what's in the spec, or get the spec changed. I can't be bothered to spend my time arguing for either. In this specific case, the spec isolates this one as referring to "JavaScript with ECMAScript for XML", which is a language we don't support. But the rest refer to "JavaScript", which we do support. So, I think it'd be fine to leave this one out for WebKit without altering the spec.
Alexey Proskuryakov
Comment 3 2012-05-30 14:51:02 PDT
> So, I think it'd be fine to leave this one out for WebKit without altering the spec. Makes sense to me. See also: bug 23097, where our list of supported languages is already seen as too large. I don't have an opinion here FWIW.
Pablo Flouret
Comment 4 2012-06-11 17:52:57 PDT
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 5 2012-06-12 00:02:07 PDT
Comment on attachment 146979 [details] Patch Attachment 146979 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/12809033 New failing tests: fast/html/script-allowed-types-languages.html
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 6 2012-06-12 00:02:13 PDT
Created attachment 147025 [details] Archive of layout-test-results from ec2-cr-linux-02 The attached test failures were seen while running run-webkit-tests on the chromium-ews. Bot: ec2-cr-linux-02 Port: <class 'webkitpy.common.config.ports.ChromiumXVFBPort'> Platform: Linux-2.6.35-28-virtual-x86_64-with-Ubuntu-10.10-maverick
Pablo Flouret
Comment 7 2012-06-15 14:12:58 PDT
Looks like this change should also be made in chrome's network stack. http://code.google.com/searchframe#OAMlx_jo-ck/src/net/base/mime_util.cc&l=328
Build Bot
Comment 8 2013-01-17 00:46:27 PST
Comment on attachment 146979 [details] Patch Attachment 146979 [details] did not pass mac-wk2-ews (mac-wk2): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/15903868 New failing tests: fast/tokenizer/004.html
Pablo Flouret
Comment 9 2013-01-24 15:33:37 PST
Created attachment 184596 [details] Patch for landing
Pablo Flouret
Comment 10 2013-01-24 15:34:41 PST
(In reply to comment #9) > Created an attachment (id=184596) [details] > Patch for landing Fixed the tokenizer test and added failing expectations for chromium. Chromium bug: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=172076
WebKit Review Bot
Comment 11 2013-01-25 02:00:16 PST
Comment on attachment 184596 [details] Patch for landing Attachment 184596 [details] did not pass chromium-ews (chromium-xvfb): Output: http://queues.webkit.org/results/16112378 New failing tests: svg/batik/text/textLayout2.svg svg/batik/text/smallFonts.svg
Pablo Flouret
Comment 12 2013-01-25 09:58:39 PST
Comment on attachment 184596 [details] Patch for landing Test failures look unrelated.
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 13 2022-09-03 07:41:00 PDT
I checked and this r+ patch didn't land yet. Is this needed anymore? Thanks!
Radar WebKit Bug Importer
Comment 14 2022-09-03 09:49:55 PDT
Ahmad Saleem
Comment 15 2023-12-02 06:07:13 PST
@Anne - I think you fixed similar bug to align WebKit with standard. Do we need this?
Anne van Kesteren
Comment 16 2023-12-02 06:48:40 PST
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 257080 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.