The following patterns are used here and there in V8 bindings: setDOMException(); return v8::Handle<v8::Value>(); and setDOMException(); return v8::Undefined(); By returning v8::Handle<v8::Value>() from setDOMException(), we can simplify the above patterns into this: return setDOMException();
Created attachment 143195 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 143195 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=143195&action=review > Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8Proxy.cpp:592 > - return; > + return v8::Handle<v8::Value>(); Should we return v8::Local<v8::Value> ? I guess it doesn't matter for empty handles.
Comment on attachment 143195 [details] Patch View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=143195&action=review >> Source/WebCore/bindings/v8/V8Proxy.cpp:592 >> + return v8::Handle<v8::Value>(); > > Should we return v8::Local<v8::Value> ? I guess it doesn't matter for empty handles. It doesn't matter. V8::Local<v8::Value> can be casted to v8::Handle<v8::Value>. I used v8::Handle<v8::Value> just because throwError()s return v8::Handle<v8::Value>. Do you think V8::Local<v8::Value> is better?
I don't think it makes any difference for empty handles.
Comment on attachment 143195 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 143195 Committed r117926: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/117926>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.