Convert some MathML layout tests to reftests
Created attachment 141490 [details] Patch
Comment on attachment 141490 [details] Patch I guess we can't use xhtml extension for expected files?
I didn't try making the expected files .xhtml. I'd prefer .html going forward, since it's easier to include MathML (HTML5 does the right thing by default for namespaces) and <script>s, etc. We should of course still have some old .xhtml test sources, for users who do (or did) that, but if we can generate results & new tests mostly using .html it seems easier & better. Let me know if you disagree, of course - I am still new.
Nah, that's fine. In fact, it's probably preferable to fix both HTML and XHTML so that we can make sure their rendering match.
s/fix/mix/
As Dave mentions, html is infinitely easier to use than xhtml. We have bugs in our xhtml/xml handling for both SVG and MathML I'm sure. For those, we'll need those xml tests, but otherwise we should just do html when we can. :)
Comment on attachment 141490 [details] Patch Clearing flags on attachment: 141490 Committed r116829: <http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/116829>
All reviewed patches have been landed. Closing bug.